| Summary: | 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 中國大陸研究所碩士班 === 96 === The present paper after “the CCP reform and open policy''s about dialectical thought (1979-1992)”as a topic, was mainly in discusses 1979 to 1992 this 14 years, CCP in route regarding left and right dispute, attempted comes from the diagnostic method angle to analyze, hoped that could by the thesis, antithesis, synthesis regard the CCP internal contradictions conflict, and produced finally compromise result.
Textually divided into five chapters, the dissertation actually comprises four main parts :
Part one discusses the meaning of right and left political football after China’s opening and reforming. Firstly analyze CCP pure ideology and practical ideology.Has had the limit opening and the expansion develop economy again since 11 Third Session aperiodic explained that the reform and open policy with insists the Four Fundamental Principles the dialectical thoughts.
The second part in “Chinese characteristic''s socialism”, besides is emphatically from the CCP 12th National People''s Congress g to the theory elaboration which 13th big consummate gradually, the CCP also uses the Chinese characteristic socialism to do after about dialectical result, this point may from the basic line which 13th loudly proposed: “a center, two fundamental points”
The third part concentrated in Deng Xiaoping 1992 southern tour speech, its goal was the surname capital surname society argument which produced in the solution society, and advocated that further expanded the reform and open policy; But time Deng Xiaoping southern tour speech proposes “against left cautious right”, finally makes tuning which argued for about.
The fourth part is a thesis, antithesis, synthesis the diagnostic method which carries on the present paper the research, has drawn three conclusions
1. All “synthesis” is comes from the compromise
2. The CCP in the ideology, is the part which already has with the new glossary packing and insisted
3. The compromise with insisted that after constituting “the CCP reform and open policy about dialectical thought”
|
|---|
