The Research of Design Thinking from Schema Theory- A Comparison between Expert and Novice

碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 創新設計研究所 === 96 === Design was considered as a special mental activity, because it happens frequently some ambiguous behaviors during design. There are uncertain beginning and end point as well as judgment criterion, and frequently contained the intuition behavior .How does an epe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen –Cheia Lin, 林文傑
Other Authors: Shou -Jen Bien
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/mgw42t
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 創新設計研究所 === 96 === Design was considered as a special mental activity, because it happens frequently some ambiguous behaviors during design. There are uncertain beginning and end point as well as judgment criterion, and frequently contained the intuition behavior .How does an eperienced Expert do the thinking activity of design? What’s difference between Expert and Novice''s? It’s so obvious that the Expert has the more design knowledge and the experience than the Novice, but why the Expert can understand the complex design question? How does the Expert create the feature of subject ?As cognitive psychology viewpoint, this research attempt to describe the relationship between the designer converted schema and the design thinking .Through the experimental study, this paper want to discuss the different design thinking of attribute between the Expert and the Novice, then analyze the converted schema. This paper is based on the experiment method to carry on the case studies and apply the “thinking aloud” .According to the complexion of the thesis, this experiment divided into two parts : divergence and convergence. Each sample must complete two tests. Therefore, we can observe that what the influence of design thinking when the Expert and Novice face the two subjects. This study want to discuss what’s the difference between them. the study carries on recollection interview after the examination, and makes up the possible flaw from the thinking aloud. The findings are the following. (1)In design divergence, the Expert’s schema are macro view, systemic, and objective attribute. The Novice‘s are squint to micro view, bitty, and subjective. (2)In design transformation, the Expert’s schema are deep-structured, and abstract. The Novice’s are apparent and concrete. (3)In design convergence, the Expert’s schema have “working forward strategies”, and many suppositions. The Novice’s have “working backward strategies”, and just only one supposition. (4)In design circulation, the Expert’s schema have more ability of controlling than the Novice’s. After the finally integration, the study induces the Expert’s and the Novice’s schema mold of design thinking, and provides the reference to the design education.