Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment

碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 技術及職業教育研究所 === 96 === This study constructed the rubrics of web-based portfolio assessment, which is the combination of web-based portfolio assessment system. This experiment was taken by Department of Accounting affairs students, who took computer application,from a vocational s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming-Fang Wu, 吳明芳
Other Authors: 張基成
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/3jh92y
id ndltd-TW-096TIT05677049
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096TIT056770492019-07-20T03:37:44Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/3jh92y Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment 網路化檔案評量標準與信、效度之建立 Ming-Fang Wu 吳明芳 碩士 國立臺北科技大學 技術及職業教育研究所 96 This study constructed the rubrics of web-based portfolio assessment, which is the combination of web-based portfolio assessment system. This experiment was taken by Department of Accounting affairs students, who took computer application,from a vocational school in northern Taiwan. Based on the result, we found the reliability and validity of portfolio assessment. The aim and result of this research are as followed: The part of Rubrics of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment: 1. Founding the grading standard of The Rubrics of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment, this includes 6 aspects and 32 rubrics. 2. The reliability in the work aspect is the highest, while it is the lowest in the aspect of motion. The part of the reliability of web-based portfolio assessment: 1. The web-based portfolio assessment has good reliability. 2. The teacher assessment is a highly reliable web-based portfolio assessment, which includes the reliability between examinees and examinees themselves. 3. Self assessment is a kind of reliable web-based portfolio assessment.4. peer-assessment doesn’t have enough reliability, and the reason needs further research for proofs.The part of web-based portfolio assessment system:1. The web-based portfolio assessment system that this research founds has good validity2. Self evaluation is a valid way of web-based portfolio assessment.3. The validity of peer-assessment is low.4. The validity of self evaluation of web-based portfolio assessment is higher than that of peer-assessment.There is much difference between educator’s grading, self valuation, and peer-assessment; peer-assessment is the loosest, while those from the educators are the strictest. The difficulties and restrictions from reliability and validity are that although various evolution processes helps upgrade the reliability and validity of assessment, it affects the proof of them as well. 張基成 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 212 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 技術及職業教育研究所 === 96 === This study constructed the rubrics of web-based portfolio assessment, which is the combination of web-based portfolio assessment system. This experiment was taken by Department of Accounting affairs students, who took computer application,from a vocational school in northern Taiwan. Based on the result, we found the reliability and validity of portfolio assessment. The aim and result of this research are as followed: The part of Rubrics of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment: 1. Founding the grading standard of The Rubrics of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment, this includes 6 aspects and 32 rubrics. 2. The reliability in the work aspect is the highest, while it is the lowest in the aspect of motion. The part of the reliability of web-based portfolio assessment: 1. The web-based portfolio assessment has good reliability. 2. The teacher assessment is a highly reliable web-based portfolio assessment, which includes the reliability between examinees and examinees themselves. 3. Self assessment is a kind of reliable web-based portfolio assessment.4. peer-assessment doesn’t have enough reliability, and the reason needs further research for proofs.The part of web-based portfolio assessment system:1. The web-based portfolio assessment system that this research founds has good validity2. Self evaluation is a valid way of web-based portfolio assessment.3. The validity of peer-assessment is low.4. The validity of self evaluation of web-based portfolio assessment is higher than that of peer-assessment.There is much difference between educator’s grading, self valuation, and peer-assessment; peer-assessment is the loosest, while those from the educators are the strictest. The difficulties and restrictions from reliability and validity are that although various evolution processes helps upgrade the reliability and validity of assessment, it affects the proof of them as well.
author2 張基成
author_facet 張基成
Ming-Fang Wu
吳明芳
author Ming-Fang Wu
吳明芳
spellingShingle Ming-Fang Wu
吳明芳
Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment
author_sort Ming-Fang Wu
title Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment
title_short Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment
title_full Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment
title_fullStr Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Construction of The Rubrics, Reliability and Validity of Web-Based Portfolio Assessment
title_sort construction of the rubrics, reliability and validity of web-based portfolio assessment
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/3jh92y
work_keys_str_mv AT mingfangwu constructionoftherubricsreliabilityandvalidityofwebbasedportfolioassessment
AT wúmíngfāng constructionoftherubricsreliabilityandvalidityofwebbasedportfolioassessment
AT mingfangwu wǎnglùhuàdàngànpíngliàngbiāozhǔnyǔxìnxiàodùzhījiànlì
AT wúmíngfāng wǎnglùhuàdàngànpíngliàngbiāozhǔnyǔxìnxiàodùzhījiànlì
_version_ 1719228530262278144