| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北科技大學 === 建築與都市設計研究所 === 96 === The main purpose of this study is to confirm the assessment indicators for the renovation projects of the existing elementary and junior high schools in Taipei County under the “Sustainable Campus” program and identify the problems faced by the schools in these renovation projects, so as to establish a set of assessment indicators and scoring tables most suitable for the elementary and junior high schools in Taipei County for the “Sustainable Campus” renovation projects.
The research is conducted through three approaches. The first approach contains the analysis of relevant documents and collection/classification of the problems relating to the “Sustainable Campus” program of the existing schools. We also provides in this part a recommended structure for the assessment of the renovation projects, which includes six major phases, (i.e., “Ecological cycles in campus”, “Water usage, saving and water environment”, “Energy application and new clean energy supply”, “Resource flows”, “Healthy architecture” and “Green education”), 26 prime indicators and 126 sub-indicators. The second approach contains the questionnaire survey and analysis hierarchy process. Using the Expert Choice 2000 software, we have worked on the weight distribution and consistency check on the valid questionnaires returned, so as to provide adequate recommendations on the corresponding weightings for the indicators and the score weighting. For the third approach, we have conducted a sensitivity nalysis on the weighting of the indicators, which were used as reference material for selecting the indicators and constructing the scoring tables. From the research, we have reached the following conclusion:
1.Based on the input of the campus users, the top three priorities for the “Sustainable Campus” renovation projects are “Green education”, “Resource flow” and “Water usage, savings and water environment”. The attention paid to indicators under the “Ecological cycle in campus” group is relatively lower. The result shows that the campus users are paying less attention to the sustainability of the “Ecological cycle in campus”. They are more concerned with issues directly relating to the physical operations of the schools.
2.Based on our sub-group analysis on the replies from the campus users, we understand that the “Principal” sub-group values the most the “Water usage, saving and water environment”; the “Chief of General Affairs” sub-group pays the most attention to the “Water usage, saving and water environment” as well, the “Chief of Student Affairs” sub-group tends to focus the most on “Green Education”; the “Parents and Students” sub-group pays the most attention to the “Resource Flow”; and the “Teachers” sub-group also focuses the most on the “Green Education”.
3.When facilitating the campus renovation, the school management team may flexibly adjust the relevant indicators and sub-indicators based on the results of the internal questionnaire survey and the local environmental factors. They may also consider selecting a single group or several groups of the indicators to meet their assessment and scoring requirements.
|
|---|
