Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry

碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 管理學院MBA === 96 === The purpose of this study is to look for a continuing operating company which experienced unsuccessful Mergers & Acquisitions and tried to discussing & analyzing its M&A motives, operation process as and management activities as well.The study tried...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chi-Ju Fan, 范琪茹
Other Authors: none
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81002891310973822195
id ndltd-TW-096NTUS5735011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096NTUS57350112016-05-13T04:15:16Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81002891310973822195 Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry 企業購併成效失敗分析-以我國主機板產業個案C公司為例 Chi-Ju Fan 范琪茹 碩士 國立臺灣科技大學 管理學院MBA 96 The purpose of this study is to look for a continuing operating company which experienced unsuccessful Mergers & Acquisitions and tried to discussing & analyzing its M&A motives, operation process as and management activities as well.The study tried to generalize a conclusion from collecting & analyzing the instances. It is believed the conclusion would benefit or help some managers or administrator by providing a comprehensive but in-depth reference value. Discovered & findings of this research: Proposition 1: The driving force of enterprise’s M&A strategy is restrained to the industrial vicissitude strength. Proposition 2: The acquisition can not build up a real competitive edge in industry (e.g. the so-called large plant among fist tier competitor) if the M&A activity cannot reach in higher status or gain the dominate position in scale competition. Proposition 3: When implementation of M&A activity, highly cognition difference to the M&A purpose among middle to high managers would result to a failure of M&A activity. Proposition 4: To pursue the organization growth or transforming by M&A strategy, but never link the M&A strategy to the integration management and post merger audit plan, must cause the ignorance of the necessity of doing organizational adjustment or amendment, then it is difficult to have better acquisition performance. Propositon 5: The enterprise carries on the organization to transform; it’s not feasible to replace the top leader only. It’s inseparable to the transformation plan, that higher managers and secondary roles have the authority with to carry out the leader’s plan. none 鄭仁偉 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 84 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 管理學院MBA === 96 === The purpose of this study is to look for a continuing operating company which experienced unsuccessful Mergers & Acquisitions and tried to discussing & analyzing its M&A motives, operation process as and management activities as well.The study tried to generalize a conclusion from collecting & analyzing the instances. It is believed the conclusion would benefit or help some managers or administrator by providing a comprehensive but in-depth reference value. Discovered & findings of this research: Proposition 1: The driving force of enterprise’s M&A strategy is restrained to the industrial vicissitude strength. Proposition 2: The acquisition can not build up a real competitive edge in industry (e.g. the so-called large plant among fist tier competitor) if the M&A activity cannot reach in higher status or gain the dominate position in scale competition. Proposition 3: When implementation of M&A activity, highly cognition difference to the M&A purpose among middle to high managers would result to a failure of M&A activity. Proposition 4: To pursue the organization growth or transforming by M&A strategy, but never link the M&A strategy to the integration management and post merger audit plan, must cause the ignorance of the necessity of doing organizational adjustment or amendment, then it is difficult to have better acquisition performance. Propositon 5: The enterprise carries on the organization to transform; it’s not feasible to replace the top leader only. It’s inseparable to the transformation plan, that higher managers and secondary roles have the authority with to carry out the leader’s plan.
author2 none
author_facet none
Chi-Ju Fan
范琪茹
author Chi-Ju Fan
范琪茹
spellingShingle Chi-Ju Fan
范琪茹
Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry
author_sort Chi-Ju Fan
title Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry
title_short Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry
title_full Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry
title_fullStr Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry
title_full_unstemmed Factors Analysis of the M&A failure - An Example of Taiwan Main board Industry
title_sort factors analysis of the m&a failure - an example of taiwan main board industry
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81002891310973822195
work_keys_str_mv AT chijufan factorsanalysisofthemafailureanexampleoftaiwanmainboardindustry
AT fànqírú factorsanalysisofthemafailureanexampleoftaiwanmainboardindustry
AT chijufan qǐyègòubìngchéngxiàoshībàifēnxīyǐwǒguózhǔjībǎnchǎnyègèàncgōngsīwèilì
AT fànqírú qǐyègòubìngchéngxiàoshībàifēnxīyǐwǒguózhǔjībǎnchǎnyègèàncgōngsīwèilì
_version_ 1718267865602195456