A Study of Public Construction Planning and Budget Review Items—Using Building Projects as An Example

• Main Authors: Shin-chang Chou, 周心昌
• Other Authors: H. Ping (Jack) Tserng
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2008
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62774703104407352407

碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 土木工程學研究所 === 96 === With an aim to improve the quality of public construction review operations, this study investigated construction project planning and review operations from previous literature, theories, and practical experience of the researcher. From three perspectives, namely “procedural perspective”, “technical perspective”, and “budget perspective”, six key dimensions of review in the preliminary planning stage, including “procedural integrity”, “plan suitability”, “operationality”, “economy”, “time-effectiveness”, and “risk” were induced. Further, ten key dimensions of review in the basic design stage, including “procedural integrity”, “plan logicality”, “design suitability”, “safety”, “economicality”, “constructability”, “maintainability”, “ecological sustainability”, “time-effectiveness”, and “legality” were also explored. Totally, 26 and 30 review factors were proposed for the two stages, respectively. Through questionnaire survey and interview with several experts in practical construction planning and review, 22 and 26 review factors that were considered either very important or important for the two stages were selected from the afore-mentioned factors. Selected on the basis of the precious experience of experts with construction knowledge and practical experience in project implementation and review, these factors were further modified through statistic verifications. Therefore, they could hopefully serve as a reference for authorities concerned and be applied. The authorities concerned could select factors according to project demands to execute the review more prudently, comply with the goal of review effectiveness set up by the government, and ultimately enhance the overall review quality. To sum up, in this study, factors affecting the quality of construction planning and review were proposed from three perspectives, namely “procedural perspective”, “technical perspective”, and “budget perspective”, and discussed to provide a reference for authorities concerned on review operations. In the conclusion, it was suggested that additional attention should be paid to important factors during review operations. Users should select factors depending on the stage and maturity of constructions drawings and flexibility apply them according to the professionalism of the administrator and project properties, so as to enhance the overall quality of public construction review operations.