| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北教育大學 === 藝術學系碩士班 === 96 === Exploring Creativity System Model of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, it is found that explanations of 3 components, such as domain, field and individual are based on knowledge, time and space, life experience. However, I consider internal connections within each component as the critical parts instead of only interconnections among 3 components, when focusing on interaction of creativity system. I apply the quasi-experimental method to discuss the interaction relationship between individuals.
The study randomly separates a girl class in second year of art senior high school into different teams to discuss different topics and accept 11 objects which are freely deployed, incorporated into figure drawings, and referred to questionnaire filling out. 43 effective ones out of 51 questionnaires are returned. Art works are evaluated by 6 evaluators from 2 groups according to 3 examination categories and application of visual art symbols. The results show scores of completion are highly related to creativity (person = .663，p<0.05). Visual art knowledge system is represented by art work and explanation texts for art work, and criteria of visual art domain component have differentiations. 2 groups of examinees have no significant differences in terms of scores on visual art creativity.
Research questions 1: Discussing whether there is influence on creativity of students in visual art education spots— experimental group and control group do not have significant difference on scores of visual art creativity. Research questions 2: The study findings exhibit its meaning to Taiwanese art education spots—the 3 components of visual art creativity system are euuivalent important. Social cultures are momenrous to visual art. The visual art domain is very important to visual art creativity. The gatekeepers of the visual art field are extremely important. Heritage of symbol system is contributable to art education. The criterions of visual art creativity deserve thinking seriously; might problems are the turing points of visual art creativity.
The study confirms component interactions in the creativity system theory of Csikszentmihalyi to explain performance of creativity in Taiwanese art education spot, however, some questions still need to be tested in the future.
|
|---|
