The Discussion on Education Target for National Control and Regulation of Athlete Doping from Point of View of Social Justice

• Main Authors: Yi-Chuan HUNG, 洪義筌
• Other Authors: Jui-Fu CHEN
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2008
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/3q29m5

碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 體育學系 === 96 === The Discussion on Education Target for National Control and Regulation of Athlete Doping from Point of View of Social Justice June,2008 Hung, Yi-Chuan Advisor: Chen, Jui-Fu, Ph.D Abstract This research is based on social justice, its unique political philosophy and viewpoint. It mainly discusses the educational target for national authorities’ goals of combating doping among athletes. Additionally, the relative proper regulation and control are examined for the realization. Those main goals are as follows: (1) national regulation against athlete doping has to be understood; (2) the origin and meaning of social justice should be studied in accordance with mainstream philosophers’ theories for further analysis; (3)the joint responses between International Olympic Committee, athletes and nations are evaluated towards relative questions and limitations to combat doping in sport; (4) the analysis of social justice is demonstrated to show the output and defect of doping control by public authorities; (5) the lessons of Taiwan athlete doping have to be explained for further inspiration of the education. Accordingly, this research takes the philosophy of education as the target analysis method and attempts to expand from different theories about social justice. Under different political ideologies, the control of "Athlete Doping Abuse" and its dynamic meaning of educational philosophy are studied in this research. For the above, the conclusion of this study shows as follows:(1) the intentions towards the abuse of doping can be changeable and described by the theories of "Utilitarianism", "Liberalism" and " Communitarianism"; (2) national control and regulation should take care of "self-decision right" and "the free will" among athletes; (3) national regulation should be applicable to "soft control" against doping abuse in sport; (4) the education should be used as the first line of defense for social justice to combat doping among athletes. Key word: athlete doping, anti-doping movement, social justice, education target