THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === In order to improve the transparency of financial statements and converge with the International Financial Accounting Standards, the Taiwan Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.34 “Accounting For Financi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeng-jong Lin, 林正中
Other Authors: HUI-LING CHEN
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/98571215829129879026
id ndltd-TW-096NCU05214022
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096NCU052140222016-05-11T04:16:23Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/98571215829129879026 THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 金融商品會計對資訊攸關影響之探討 Jeng-jong Lin 林正中 碩士 國立中央大學 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 96 In order to improve the transparency of financial statements and converge with the International Financial Accounting Standards, the Taiwan Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.34 “Accounting For Financial Instruments” (SFAS No.34) in December, 2003. According to the requirements of SFAS No.34, the financial instruments classified as “trading”, “designed financial asset at fair value through profits and losses” and “available-for-sale” are measured at the fair value. The derivatives are recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value. Furthermore, the unrealized gains and losses due to fair value changes are recognized in the financial statements. The objective of this study is to examine whether unrealized gains or losses due to changes of fair value are relevant to firm valuation. Based on Ohlson (1995) and Feltham and Ohlson (1995) valuation model, this study designs several valuation models. Except abnormal earnings and book value, valuation gain on financial instruments, valuation loss on financial instruments, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles are included into valuation model. We collect financial information on the population of listed companies from the Taiwan Economic Journal. The sample period of this study comprises 2006 and 2007. The empirical results show that abnormal earnings and book value are significantly relevant to firm valuation. Furthermore, valuation gain on financial instruments and unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments are significantly value-relevant. However, valuation loss on financial instruments and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles resulting from the adoption of SFAS No.34 in 2006 are not value-relevant. HUI-LING CHEN 陳慧玲 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 76 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中央大學 === 財務金融學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === In order to improve the transparency of financial statements and converge with the International Financial Accounting Standards, the Taiwan Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.34 “Accounting For Financial Instruments” (SFAS No.34) in December, 2003. According to the requirements of SFAS No.34, the financial instruments classified as “trading”, “designed financial asset at fair value through profits and losses” and “available-for-sale” are measured at the fair value. The derivatives are recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value. Furthermore, the unrealized gains and losses due to fair value changes are recognized in the financial statements. The objective of this study is to examine whether unrealized gains or losses due to changes of fair value are relevant to firm valuation. Based on Ohlson (1995) and Feltham and Ohlson (1995) valuation model, this study designs several valuation models. Except abnormal earnings and book value, valuation gain on financial instruments, valuation loss on financial instruments, unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments, and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles are included into valuation model. We collect financial information on the population of listed companies from the Taiwan Economic Journal. The sample period of this study comprises 2006 and 2007. The empirical results show that abnormal earnings and book value are significantly relevant to firm valuation. Furthermore, valuation gain on financial instruments and unrealized gain or loss on financial instruments are significantly value-relevant. However, valuation loss on financial instruments and cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles resulting from the adoption of SFAS No.34 in 2006 are not value-relevant.
author2 HUI-LING CHEN
author_facet HUI-LING CHEN
Jeng-jong Lin
林正中
author Jeng-jong Lin
林正中
spellingShingle Jeng-jong Lin
林正中
THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
author_sort Jeng-jong Lin
title THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
title_short THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
title_full THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
title_fullStr THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
title_full_unstemmed THE VALUE RELEVANCE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
title_sort value relevance of financial instruments
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/98571215829129879026
work_keys_str_mv AT jengjonglin thevaluerelevanceoffinancialinstruments
AT línzhèngzhōng thevaluerelevanceoffinancialinstruments
AT jengjonglin jīnróngshāngpǐnhuìjìduìzīxùnyōuguānyǐngxiǎngzhītàntǎo
AT línzhèngzhōng jīnróngshāngpǐnhuìjìduìzīxùnyōuguānyǐngxiǎngzhītàntǎo
AT jengjonglin valuerelevanceoffinancialinstruments
AT línzhèngzhōng valuerelevanceoffinancialinstruments
_version_ 1718264744620589056