Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 機械工程學系碩博士班 === 96 === Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indica...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2008
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57359333621339903553 |
id |
ndltd-TW-096NCKU5490140 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-096NCKU54901402015-11-23T04:03:10Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57359333621339903553 Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment 產品X倍數計算方法之改良研究 Chieh-hao Huang 黃玠豪 碩士 國立成功大學 機械工程學系碩博士班 96 Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indicator Methods to calculate their own products, they can’t compare themselves to other companies. This research collects, compares and explains some companies’ Factor X Indicator Methods. Most companies use Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the environmental loads, hence the items which they use to evaluate don’t have much differences. Therefore, bigger diversification of the same items in different companies pertain product values, the year and calculation of old and new products are collected amd analysed .Also, some methods are proposed to solve the diversifications. First, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to turn consumer’s opinions into product value and find the higher index of product value. There are three options of product year choosing: first is choosing the oldest one, second is choosing the worst function one, and the third one is choosing the specific year product. Finally, there are two options of Factor X Indicator calculation. One is multiple product value year to its own index and add all of them, the other is multiple productvalue but not including age to its own index and add all together then multiple age. Consequently, put all the product information to above proposed methods and we can calculate the Factor X indicator methods of different products. Every company can use the reform method to get the product improvement multiplier, and compare them to different companies. Hence, it is more objective and easier for consumers to compare with all products made by different companies by using QFD for turning consumer’s opinions to product engineering function in index instead of companies using their own approaches. Ja-hau Chen 陳家豪 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 100 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 機械工程學系碩博士班 === 96 === Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indicator Methods to calculate their own products, they can’t compare themselves to other companies.
This research collects, compares and explains some companies’ Factor X Indicator Methods. Most companies use Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the environmental loads, hence the items which they use to evaluate don’t have much differences. Therefore, bigger diversification of the same items in different companies pertain product values, the year and calculation of old and new products are collected amd analysed .Also, some methods are proposed to solve the diversifications. First, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to turn consumer’s opinions into product value and find the higher index of product value. There are three options of product year choosing: first is choosing the oldest one, second is choosing the worst function one, and the third one is choosing the specific year product. Finally, there are two options of Factor X Indicator calculation. One is multiple product value year to its own index and add all of them, the other is multiple productvalue but not including age to its own index and add all together then multiple age.
Consequently, put all the product information to above proposed methods and we can calculate the Factor X indicator methods of different products. Every company can use the reform method to get the product improvement multiplier, and compare them to different companies. Hence, it is more objective and easier for consumers to compare with all products made by different companies by using QFD for turning consumer’s opinions to product engineering function in index instead of companies using their own approaches.
|
author2 |
Ja-hau Chen |
author_facet |
Ja-hau Chen Chieh-hao Huang 黃玠豪 |
author |
Chieh-hao Huang 黃玠豪 |
spellingShingle |
Chieh-hao Huang 黃玠豪 Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
author_sort |
Chieh-hao Huang |
title |
Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
title_short |
Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
title_full |
Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
title_fullStr |
Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
title_sort |
improving computation methods of factor x indicator for product assessment |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57359333621339903553 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chiehhaohuang improvingcomputationmethodsoffactorxindicatorforproductassessment AT huángjièháo improvingcomputationmethodsoffactorxindicatorforproductassessment AT chiehhaohuang chǎnpǐnxbèishùjìsuànfāngfǎzhīgǎiliángyánjiū AT huángjièháo chǎnpǐnxbèishùjìsuànfāngfǎzhīgǎiliángyánjiū |
_version_ |
1718134136900681728 |