Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 機械工程學系碩博士班 === 96 === Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chieh-hao Huang, 黃玠豪
Other Authors: Ja-hau Chen
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57359333621339903553
id ndltd-TW-096NCKU5490140
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096NCKU54901402015-11-23T04:03:10Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57359333621339903553 Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment 產品X倍數計算方法之改良研究 Chieh-hao Huang 黃玠豪 碩士 國立成功大學 機械工程學系碩博士班 96 Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indicator Methods to calculate their own products, they can’t compare themselves to other companies. This research collects, compares and explains some companies’ Factor X Indicator Methods. Most companies use Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the environmental loads, hence the items which they use to evaluate don’t have much differences. Therefore, bigger diversification of the same items in different companies pertain product values, the year and calculation of old and new products are collected amd analysed .Also, some methods are proposed to solve the diversifications. First, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to turn consumer’s opinions into product value and find the higher index of product value. There are three options of product year choosing: first is choosing the oldest one, second is choosing the worst function one, and the third one is choosing the specific year product. Finally, there are two options of Factor X Indicator calculation. One is multiple product value year to its own index and add all of them, the other is multiple productvalue but not including age to its own index and add all together then multiple age. Consequently, put all the product information to above proposed methods and we can calculate the Factor X indicator methods of different products. Every company can use the reform method to get the product improvement multiplier, and compare them to different companies. Hence, it is more objective and easier for consumers to compare with all products made by different companies by using QFD for turning consumer’s opinions to product engineering function in index instead of companies using their own approaches. Ja-hau Chen 陳家豪 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 100 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 機械工程學系碩博士班 === 96 === Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indicator Methods to calculate their own products, they can’t compare themselves to other companies. This research collects, compares and explains some companies’ Factor X Indicator Methods. Most companies use Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the environmental loads, hence the items which they use to evaluate don’t have much differences. Therefore, bigger diversification of the same items in different companies pertain product values, the year and calculation of old and new products are collected amd analysed .Also, some methods are proposed to solve the diversifications. First, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to turn consumer’s opinions into product value and find the higher index of product value. There are three options of product year choosing: first is choosing the oldest one, second is choosing the worst function one, and the third one is choosing the specific year product. Finally, there are two options of Factor X Indicator calculation. One is multiple product value year to its own index and add all of them, the other is multiple productvalue but not including age to its own index and add all together then multiple age. Consequently, put all the product information to above proposed methods and we can calculate the Factor X indicator methods of different products. Every company can use the reform method to get the product improvement multiplier, and compare them to different companies. Hence, it is more objective and easier for consumers to compare with all products made by different companies by using QFD for turning consumer’s opinions to product engineering function in index instead of companies using their own approaches.
author2 Ja-hau Chen
author_facet Ja-hau Chen
Chieh-hao Huang
黃玠豪
author Chieh-hao Huang
黃玠豪
spellingShingle Chieh-hao Huang
黃玠豪
Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
author_sort Chieh-hao Huang
title Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
title_short Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
title_full Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
title_fullStr Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment
title_sort improving computation methods of factor x indicator for product assessment
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/57359333621339903553
work_keys_str_mv AT chiehhaohuang improvingcomputationmethodsoffactorxindicatorforproductassessment
AT huángjièháo improvingcomputationmethodsoffactorxindicatorforproductassessment
AT chiehhaohuang chǎnpǐnxbèishùjìsuànfāngfǎzhīgǎiliángyánjiū
AT huángjièháo chǎnpǐnxbèishùjìsuànfāngfǎzhīgǎiliángyánjiū
_version_ 1718134136900681728