| Summary: | 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 教育領導與發展研究所 === 96 === The purpose of this study is to explore junior high school teachers’ attitudes towards the “zero corporal punishment education policy” presented by the Department of Education of Taipei County Government. This study also aims to analyze junior high school teachers’ recognition of the zero corporal punishment education policy and compare their differences resulted from different personal backgrounds. To understand junior high school teachers’ attitudes towards the zero corporal punishment education policy, this research employs the survey questionnaire method; “The Attitudes of The Present Taipei County Junior High School Teachers Toward The Zero Corporal Punishment” was used as a tool to conduct the research. The research subjects were the teachers chosen from public junior high schools in Taipei County. Two phases of sampling were adopted. 38 schools were selected as samples. At the first phase, cluster sampling according to the school size is adopted; at the second phase, quota sampling and simple random sampling according to school size were adopted. The total number of questionnaires issued was 665 and the returned number of valid questionnaires was 603.The valid returning rate is 90.6%. Data obtained from the survey were processed and analyzed via SPSS 12.0 for Windows statistical software in number distribution, percentage, average, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA and Scheffé Post-Hoc comparison method.
Major conclusion are as follows:
1. Teachers are inclined to support the zero corporal punishment education policy. Besides, the general discipline measures can be accepted by teachers. However, middle-high level concern towards the negative influence resulted from the zero corporal punishment education policy did exist among teachers.
2. After the zero corporal punishment education policy was practiced on campus, teachers’ attitude towards how to discipline students has changed.
3. In teachers’ recognition of the zero corporal punishment education policy, the teachers had a positive recognition towards guidance and discipline, protection of students’ right, punishment for juvenile delinquency, and positive discipline.
4. There are significant differences in the teachers’ attitudes and recognition based on different genders, teacher training models, teachers’ positions in school, school size, and whether the teacher has children.
5. Different teacher training models, teachers’ positions in school, and whether the teacher has children result in significant difference in the teachers’ recognition of the zero corporal punishment education policy.
Key words: junior high school teachers
zero corporal punishment
attitude towards the zero corporal punishment education policy
|
|---|
