An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View

碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 語言學研究所 === 96 === This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dialect education policy from the view of students’ contact frequency of Southern Min, their language proficiency, and their attitude toward Southern Min. Through questionnaire survey and statistic analysis from three...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chien Hsiao-Kuang, 簡孝光
Other Authors: Joseph H.Hsu
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81072340123973712452
id ndltd-TW-096FJU00462004
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096FJU004620042015-10-13T13:51:29Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81072340123973712452 An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View 由社會語言學觀點分析台灣閩南語鄉土語言教育的成效---以基隆及台北地區為例 Chien Hsiao-Kuang 簡孝光 碩士 輔仁大學 語言學研究所 96 This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dialect education policy from the view of students’ contact frequency of Southern Min, their language proficiency, and their attitude toward Southern Min. Through questionnaire survey and statistic analysis from three different age groups (junior high school students, college and university students, and general public), we can see that dialect education failed to increase students’ Southern Min proficiency and contact frequency. What’s worse, more students begin to dislike Southern Min than like it. And they don’t wish to have Southern Min classes in junior and senior high school. Another way to evaluate the policy is through language planning. According to Rubin(1971), there are four steps of language planning, including: fact-finding, planning, implementation, and feedback. In the case of dialect education in Taiwan, we can find that there are flaws in all the steps: no fact-finding, not careful planning, too many revisions in implementation, and the feedback system has not been established. The third way of examining the policy is to analyze from three subdivisions of dialect education: corpus planning, status planning, and acquisition planning. After a careful examination, it shows that both corpus planning and acquisition planning have serious problems. After all the above analysis, three conclusions are drawn: 1. Dialect education failed to increase the contact frequency, Southern Min ability, or the user population in junior high school students. 2. Dialect education is not successful in arousing students’ interest, and neither is it successful in arousing the public of its value toward Southern Min. 3. Southern Min is declining from generation to generation. Joseph H.Hsu 許洪坤 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 138 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 輔仁大學 === 語言學研究所 === 96 === This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of dialect education policy from the view of students’ contact frequency of Southern Min, their language proficiency, and their attitude toward Southern Min. Through questionnaire survey and statistic analysis from three different age groups (junior high school students, college and university students, and general public), we can see that dialect education failed to increase students’ Southern Min proficiency and contact frequency. What’s worse, more students begin to dislike Southern Min than like it. And they don’t wish to have Southern Min classes in junior and senior high school. Another way to evaluate the policy is through language planning. According to Rubin(1971), there are four steps of language planning, including: fact-finding, planning, implementation, and feedback. In the case of dialect education in Taiwan, we can find that there are flaws in all the steps: no fact-finding, not careful planning, too many revisions in implementation, and the feedback system has not been established. The third way of examining the policy is to analyze from three subdivisions of dialect education: corpus planning, status planning, and acquisition planning. After a careful examination, it shows that both corpus planning and acquisition planning have serious problems. After all the above analysis, three conclusions are drawn: 1. Dialect education failed to increase the contact frequency, Southern Min ability, or the user population in junior high school students. 2. Dialect education is not successful in arousing students’ interest, and neither is it successful in arousing the public of its value toward Southern Min. 3. Southern Min is declining from generation to generation.
author2 Joseph H.Hsu
author_facet Joseph H.Hsu
Chien Hsiao-Kuang
簡孝光
author Chien Hsiao-Kuang
簡孝光
spellingShingle Chien Hsiao-Kuang
簡孝光
An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View
author_sort Chien Hsiao-Kuang
title An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View
title_short An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View
title_full An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View
title_fullStr An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View
title_full_unstemmed An Analysis of Taiwan Dialect Education on Southern Min, in Keelung and Taipei Area: a Sociolinguistic Point of View
title_sort analysis of taiwan dialect education on southern min, in keelung and taipei area: a sociolinguistic point of view
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/81072340123973712452
work_keys_str_mv AT chienhsiaokuang ananalysisoftaiwandialecteducationonsouthernmininkeelungandtaipeiareaasociolinguisticpointofview
AT jiǎnxiàoguāng ananalysisoftaiwandialecteducationonsouthernmininkeelungandtaipeiareaasociolinguisticpointofview
AT chienhsiaokuang yóushèhuìyǔyánxuéguāndiǎnfēnxītáiwānmǐnnányǔxiāngtǔyǔyánjiàoyùdechéngxiàoyǐjīlóngjítáiběideqūwèilì
AT jiǎnxiàoguāng yóushèhuìyǔyánxuéguāndiǎnfēnxītáiwānmǐnnányǔxiāngtǔyǔyánjiàoyùdechéngxiàoyǐjīlóngjítáiběideqūwèilì
AT chienhsiaokuang analysisoftaiwandialecteducationonsouthernmininkeelungandtaipeiareaasociolinguisticpointofview
AT jiǎnxiàoguāng analysisoftaiwandialecteducationonsouthernmininkeelungandtaipeiareaasociolinguisticpointofview
_version_ 1717743630575206400