| Summary: | 碩士 === 大葉大學 === 資訊管理學系碩士在職專班 === 96 === ince Internet technology has been expanding rapidly and has had a dramatic impact on how people communicate, learn and share information. It is an implication for guidance, especially when guidance suffers difficulties today. As we know the teachers are occupied by the heavy daily load of teaching and administrative work and therefore are lack of time and human resources to guide the rejected child. This research presented the applications of Internet technology to the students’ guidance to confirm whether the online-guidance can be superior to the traditional guidance.
This study adopted Quasi-experimental Research Method. There were 16 partici-pants graded from four to six in an elementary school, Nantou County, Taiwan. They were divided into two groups: experimental group (8 participants) and control group (8 participants). The experimental and control groups received on-line and traditional guidance respectively for 14 weeks. The self-concept and interpersonal relationship scaling instruments were applied to conduct the pretest and posttest to realize the effects created by various guidance models. The quantification research data were analyzed by Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to test the hypothesis. By interviewing the students and teachers, their perception of on-line guidance in the lack of Verbal and Visual cues were analyzed. And the advantages and disadvantages of on-line guidance were also focused, and then implemented by qualitative data .The findings of the research were shown as follows.
Firstly, there were no apparent differences on the effects of self-concept and inter-personal relationship of the rejected students between the two groups.
Secondly, most of the students and teachers could have good interactions through ineternet from experimental groups and then perceived advantages of on-line guidance.
Finally, we could regard on-line guidance as an alternative way for traditional guidance. It did not mean for comprehensive guidance, but in terms of rejected children.
|
|---|
