| Summary: | 碩士 === 中原大學 === 企業管理研究所 === 96 === Abstracts
Legislative Yuan in July 2001 through the "Financial Holding Company Law," after the opening of Taiwan’s financial institutions to a new era of cross-industry operators, but also led Taiwan’s financial institutions to integrate the major acquisitions boom, 2004 to three years in Taiwan have set up The 14 financial holding companies, but after three years of development, the Commission on December 8, 2004 will be announced assessment of the financial holding company of Taiwan’s seven major indicators of performance: return on equity, return on assets, capital An adequate rate, generalized had overdue loan ratios, coverage, cost of sales, market share, etc. 7. Financial holding company's operating performance evaluation before the official test items and have their standards.
This paper in the examination of the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) announced operating performance indicators applicable to a different group of financial holding companies. In the literature through the study and empirical research, will be operating subsidiary of strategies to scale the number of branches, market share, three facters as input variables, enterprise resource strategies to total assets, employees, goodwill, employees average profit,four facters as input variables, the core competitiveness of the strategy to core business earnings, the Group network integration of the two variables as inputs, according to the competent authority and credibility units and the subjects of "secondary data" to the whole, the use of cluster Analysis and nonparametric method(ANOVA), empirical results are the following:
1. SKFH study found that the company's business strategy there are indeed
different strategy group, were named as the financial holding large-scale and medium-sized diversified financial holding, small specialized financial holding.
2. Different strategy group, its strategy variables were significantly different.
3. Different strategy group, the number of branches, market share, total assets, employees, goodwill, the Group network integration strategy, and other variables were significantly different.
4. Different business groups, rights and interests of shareholders, with operating costs of a significant difference.
|
|---|
