Interactions between U-937 human macrophages and cationic dendrimers

碩士 === 嘉南藥理科技大學 === 藥物科技研究所 === 96 === Interest in using poly(propyleneimine) (PPI) dendrimers and Cationic dendrimers such as poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) for biomedical applications is increasing. Before using dendrimers in vivo, their interactions with macrophages must be fully understood because the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yi-Lin Lin, 林宜陵
Other Authors: Jung-hua Kuo
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/44280650705066724217
Description
Summary:碩士 === 嘉南藥理科技大學 === 藥物科技研究所 === 96 === Interest in using poly(propyleneimine) (PPI) dendrimers and Cationic dendrimers such as poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) for biomedical applications is increasing. Before using dendrimers in vivo, their interactions with macrophages must be fully understood because they are primarily removed from circulation by the macrophages of the mononuclear phagocyte system. However, few investigators have studied in detail the intracellular responses that cationic dendrimers induce in macrophages. Here we examined the intracellular responses—reactive oxygen species (ROS) content, mitochondria membrane potential, cell size and complexity, and cell cycle profiles—in U-937 human macrophages treated with poly(propyleneimine) dendrimers generation 2 (DAB 2.0) and 3 (DAB 3.0). Our study focused on the concentration ranges within which cell viability was greater than 90% after PPI dendrimers had been incubated for 16 h. For spontaneous ROS generation, DAB 2.0 did not consistently generate hydrogen peroxide production with increasing dosages over the entire culture period while it was capable of generating superoxide content except during the 12 h of incubation. In contrast, DAB 3.0 did not induce any hydrogen peroxide and superoxide production except for an abrupt increase of superoxide content at 60 μg/mL after 6 h of incubation. Our results showed that ROS responses in macrophages were strongly influenced by the nature of the dendrimer surface. Except at 3 h, DAB 2.0 increased mitochondrial membrane potential for every dose and culture period. In contrast, DAB 3.0 caused a significant fluctuation in mitochondrial membrane potential only at 6 h, compared with other incubation times. Exposing macrophages to PPI dendrimers caused dramatic and significant changes in macrophage cell size and complexity, and DAB 3.0 caused greater changes than DAB 2.0 did. For incubation times longer than 1 h, propidium iodide staining showed that cells treated with DAB 2.0 and 3.0 had a higher subG1 phase (indicative of apoptosis) than did untreated cells. PPI dendrimers induced different activated patterns in ROS generation and changes of mitochondrial membrane potential than did other carriers such as cationic liposomes and polyalkylcyanoacrylate. Also, very few studies have focused on the non-specific interaction of remnant cationic dendrimers with total RNA after isolation directly from cells in vitro. We examined RNA isolation using the common method of monophasic lysis from human macrophage-like cells (U937) and mouse fibroblast cells (NIH/3T3) that had been exposed to dendrimers and DNA/dendrimer complexes using gel electrophoresis. We found that poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) and PPI dendrimers strongly altered the mobility of RNA in the gels. Our findings provide a novel insight into the cytotoxic effects at the molecular level that dendrimers cause in macrophages and such dendrimer-induced alteration in RNA mobility should be accounted for in the further processing of RNA-related applications.