Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options

碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 企業管理所 === 96 === This study compares historical volatility, GARCH (1, 1) and GJR GARCH models by using Taiwan equity options from August 1, 2004 to 31 December, 2006. In deep-out-of-the-money options in-sample fit favors the historical volatility model. However, in deep-in-the-mone...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Chih Ko, 柯羽芝
Other Authors: Ming-Chang Chen
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2008
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62736693167223144098
id ndltd-TW-096CCU05121057
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-096CCU051210572015-11-25T04:04:40Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62736693167223144098 Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options 歷史波動性、GARCH 與GJR GARCH 模型之波動性比較─台灣股票選擇權之應用 Yu-Chih Ko 柯羽芝 碩士 國立中正大學 企業管理所 96 This study compares historical volatility, GARCH (1, 1) and GJR GARCH models by using Taiwan equity options from August 1, 2004 to 31 December, 2006. In deep-out-of-the-money options in-sample fit favors the historical volatility model. However, in deep-in-the-money options, the sample favors either GARCH (1, 1) or GJR GARCH models. As for assessing the performance of the GARCH models out-of-sample, GARCH (1, 1) has better forecasting ability than the GJR GARCH model. Ming-Chang Chen 鎮明常 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 36 en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 企業管理所 === 96 === This study compares historical volatility, GARCH (1, 1) and GJR GARCH models by using Taiwan equity options from August 1, 2004 to 31 December, 2006. In deep-out-of-the-money options in-sample fit favors the historical volatility model. However, in deep-in-the-money options, the sample favors either GARCH (1, 1) or GJR GARCH models. As for assessing the performance of the GARCH models out-of-sample, GARCH (1, 1) has better forecasting ability than the GJR GARCH model.
author2 Ming-Chang Chen
author_facet Ming-Chang Chen
Yu-Chih Ko
柯羽芝
author Yu-Chih Ko
柯羽芝
spellingShingle Yu-Chih Ko
柯羽芝
Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
author_sort Yu-Chih Ko
title Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
title_short Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
title_full Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
title_fullStr Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
title_full_unstemmed Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
title_sort volatility comparisonsin historical volatility,garc hand gjrgarch models with their applications of taiwan equity options
publishDate 2008
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62736693167223144098
work_keys_str_mv AT yuchihko volatilitycomparisonsinhistoricalvolatilitygarchandgjrgarchmodelswiththeirapplicationsoftaiwanequityoptions
AT kēyǔzhī volatilitycomparisonsinhistoricalvolatilitygarchandgjrgarchmodelswiththeirapplicationsoftaiwanequityoptions
AT yuchihko lìshǐbōdòngxìnggarchyǔgjrgarchmóxíngzhībōdòngxìngbǐjiàotáiwāngǔpiàoxuǎnzéquánzhīyīngyòng
AT kēyǔzhī lìshǐbōdòngxìnggarchyǔgjrgarchmóxíngzhībōdòngxìngbǐjiàotáiwāngǔpiàoxuǎnzéquánzhīyīngyòng
_version_ 1718135563651907584