Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 企業管理所 === 96 === This study compares historical volatility, GARCH (1, 1) and GJR GARCH models by using Taiwan equity options from August 1, 2004 to 31 December, 2006. In deep-out-of-the-money options in-sample fit favors the historical volatility model. However, in deep-in-the-mone...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
2008
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62736693167223144098 |
id |
ndltd-TW-096CCU05121057 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-096CCU051210572015-11-25T04:04:40Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62736693167223144098 Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options 歷史波動性、GARCH 與GJR GARCH 模型之波動性比較─台灣股票選擇權之應用 Yu-Chih Ko 柯羽芝 碩士 國立中正大學 企業管理所 96 This study compares historical volatility, GARCH (1, 1) and GJR GARCH models by using Taiwan equity options from August 1, 2004 to 31 December, 2006. In deep-out-of-the-money options in-sample fit favors the historical volatility model. However, in deep-in-the-money options, the sample favors either GARCH (1, 1) or GJR GARCH models. As for assessing the performance of the GARCH models out-of-sample, GARCH (1, 1) has better forecasting ability than the GJR GARCH model. Ming-Chang Chen 鎮明常 2008 學位論文 ; thesis 36 en_US |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 企業管理所 === 96 === This study compares historical volatility, GARCH (1, 1) and GJR GARCH models by using Taiwan equity options from August 1, 2004 to 31 December, 2006. In deep-out-of-the-money options in-sample fit favors the historical volatility model. However, in deep-in-the-money options, the sample favors either GARCH (1, 1) or GJR GARCH models. As for assessing the performance of the GARCH models out-of-sample, GARCH (1, 1) has better forecasting ability than the GJR GARCH model.
|
author2 |
Ming-Chang Chen |
author_facet |
Ming-Chang Chen Yu-Chih Ko 柯羽芝 |
author |
Yu-Chih Ko 柯羽芝 |
spellingShingle |
Yu-Chih Ko 柯羽芝 Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options |
author_sort |
Yu-Chih Ko |
title |
Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options |
title_short |
Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options |
title_full |
Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options |
title_fullStr |
Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options |
title_full_unstemmed |
Volatility Comparisonsin Historical Volatility,GARC Hand GJRGARCH Models with their Applications of Taiwan Equity Options |
title_sort |
volatility comparisonsin historical volatility,garc hand gjrgarch models with their applications of taiwan equity options |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/62736693167223144098 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuchihko volatilitycomparisonsinhistoricalvolatilitygarchandgjrgarchmodelswiththeirapplicationsoftaiwanequityoptions AT kēyǔzhī volatilitycomparisonsinhistoricalvolatilitygarchandgjrgarchmodelswiththeirapplicationsoftaiwanequityoptions AT yuchihko lìshǐbōdòngxìnggarchyǔgjrgarchmóxíngzhībōdòngxìngbǐjiàotáiwāngǔpiàoxuǎnzéquánzhīyīngyòng AT kēyǔzhī lìshǐbōdòngxìnggarchyǔgjrgarchmóxíngzhībōdòngxìngbǐjiàotáiwāngǔpiàoxuǎnzéquánzhīyīngyòng |
_version_ |
1718135563651907584 |