| Summary: | 碩士 === 元智大學 === 管理研究所 === 95 === “Government Reform” becomes an important issue attracting global attention in recent years and a number of countries make all-out attempts to carry out government organization reengineering so as to elevate national competitiveness to face chanllenges in the 21st century. Waves of global government organization reform started in 1980’s, where “organization reengineering, new structure design, and new regulation stipulation” are main concerns for the corresponding reform. Taiwan is no exception under the global trend, where the government strives to strengthen national competitiveness via government structure reform. As indicated by the competitiveness rankings issued by International Institute for Management Development (IMD) and World Economic Forum (WEF) in 2006 and 2007, the ringleader encumbering Taiwan’s competitivness was government sector, which accordingly pushed the Taiwan government to carry out related substantial organization reengineering.
The Hsinchu Science Park is the first science park in Taiwan, which breeds a number of local satellite parks and prospers domestic high-tech industry as well as economic development. Besides economic contributions, the Hsinchu Science Park also brought about remarkable effect in enhancing Taiwan’s global reputation and cultural elevation. However, the Park also encounters to a wide variety of problems which require proper treatments, e.g. large amount of debt caused by operation fund deficits, Park-city cross-region problem deadend, etc. As an government organization, the Science Park Administration acts as an crucial entity in elevating Taiwan’s high-tech industry. Structural reengineering of the Park Administration thus play a key role in maintaining competiveness of the Park and pursuing a sustainable development of domestic high-tech industry.
This study carried out related literature surveys and interviewed relevant staffs and experts working at government sectors, the Association of Industries in Science Parks, Park surrounding universities, Park factories, and law houses. Collected data were further researched and analyzed so as to summerize potential guidelines for prospective and optimal government structure reengineerings, which act as useful references for planning, designing, or simulating future government operation models and lanuching relevant organization reforms.
|
|---|
