國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素

碩士 === 東海大學 === 企業管理學系碩士班 === 95 === Most of foreign market entry mode choice is examining productive activities. There are also lots of reasons affecting firms which want to promote their brand to international market. Therefore, this study attempts to from aspect of brand marketing, examine Dunnin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Jui-Yu, 溫芮瑜
Other Authors: 黃延聰
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67829068238612933611
id ndltd-TW-095THU00121040
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095THU001210402015-10-13T16:46:03Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67829068238612933611 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素 Wen Jui-Yu 溫芮瑜 碩士 東海大學 企業管理學系碩士班 95 Most of foreign market entry mode choice is examining productive activities. There are also lots of reasons affecting firms which want to promote their brand to international market. Therefore, this study attempts to from aspect of brand marketing, examine Dunning`s Ownership advantages (the capability to differentiate product and multinational experiences), Location advantages (market potential and risk investment) and Internalization advantage (the specific of brand marketing resource) framework how to affect brand entry mode choice, and determine if firms which select their brand entry mode based on OLI variables perform batter international brand marketing performances than firms which brand entry mode does not base on OLI variables. This study develops the hypotheses based on OLI framework and examines the hypotheses by empirical method. The variables of the capability to differentiate product, multinational experiences, market potential, risk investment and the specific of brand marketing resource are hypotheses 1 to hypotheses 5, and they are tested by logistics regression. The brand marketing performances of firms which their brand entry mode based on OLI variables are hypotheses 6-1 and 6-2, and they are tested by multiple regression. The findings of this study are: 1.Firms with higher capability to differentiate product, they select non-wholly owned of brand entry mode. 2.Firms with more multinational experiences, they select wholly owned of brand entry mode. 3.The more market potential in the foreign market, firm select wholly owned of brand entry mode. 4.The risk investment in the foreign market has no impact on brand entry mode choice. 5.Firms with more specific of brand marketing resource, they select wholly owned of brand entry mode. 6.When firm entries new foreign market, firms that brand entry mode based on OLI variables do not affect brand performance. 7.When firm entries new foreign market, firms that brand entry mode based on OLI variables have better financial performance than firms that brand entry mode do not base on OLI variables. 黃延聰 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 108 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 東海大學 === 企業管理學系碩士班 === 95 === Most of foreign market entry mode choice is examining productive activities. There are also lots of reasons affecting firms which want to promote their brand to international market. Therefore, this study attempts to from aspect of brand marketing, examine Dunning`s Ownership advantages (the capability to differentiate product and multinational experiences), Location advantages (market potential and risk investment) and Internalization advantage (the specific of brand marketing resource) framework how to affect brand entry mode choice, and determine if firms which select their brand entry mode based on OLI variables perform batter international brand marketing performances than firms which brand entry mode does not base on OLI variables. This study develops the hypotheses based on OLI framework and examines the hypotheses by empirical method. The variables of the capability to differentiate product, multinational experiences, market potential, risk investment and the specific of brand marketing resource are hypotheses 1 to hypotheses 5, and they are tested by logistics regression. The brand marketing performances of firms which their brand entry mode based on OLI variables are hypotheses 6-1 and 6-2, and they are tested by multiple regression. The findings of this study are: 1.Firms with higher capability to differentiate product, they select non-wholly owned of brand entry mode. 2.Firms with more multinational experiences, they select wholly owned of brand entry mode. 3.The more market potential in the foreign market, firm select wholly owned of brand entry mode. 4.The risk investment in the foreign market has no impact on brand entry mode choice. 5.Firms with more specific of brand marketing resource, they select wholly owned of brand entry mode. 6.When firm entries new foreign market, firms that brand entry mode based on OLI variables do not affect brand performance. 7.When firm entries new foreign market, firms that brand entry mode based on OLI variables have better financial performance than firms that brand entry mode do not base on OLI variables.
author2 黃延聰
author_facet 黃延聰
Wen Jui-Yu
溫芮瑜
author Wen Jui-Yu
溫芮瑜
spellingShingle Wen Jui-Yu
溫芮瑜
國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
author_sort Wen Jui-Yu
title 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
title_short 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
title_full 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
title_fullStr 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
title_full_unstemmed 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
title_sort 國外市場品牌進入模式之決定因素
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/67829068238612933611
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjuiyu guówàishìchǎngpǐnpáijìnrùmóshìzhījuédìngyīnsù
AT wēnruìyú guówàishìchǎngpǐnpáijìnrùmóshìzhījuédìngyīnsù
_version_ 1717775618049835008