WTO Case Studies-The US Antidumping Act of 1916

• Main Authors: Taylor, 張振斌
• Other Authors: 陳純一
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2007
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/97698996757048709805

碩士 === 中國文化大學 === 美國研究所 === 95 === Since WTO has been established in 1995, the account of disputes of its members suing in accordance with the DSU achieves 363.Case studies are absolutely important,because 60 of 363 are related to anti-dumping measures.(The statistics are up to April 15 2007)On 4 June 1998, the European Communities requested consultations with the United States pursuant to Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Article XXIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and Article 17.3 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 regarding failure on the part of the United States to repeal Title VIII of the US Revenue Act of 1916, also known as the US Antidumping Act of 1916.On 10 February 1999, Japan requested consultations with the United States pursuant to Article 4 of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, Article XXII:1 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 and Article 17.2 of the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 regarding Title VIII of the US Revenue Act of 1916, also known as the US Anti Dumping Act of 1916.The law war Starts.