| Summary: | 博士 === 中國文化大學 === 政治學研究所 === 95 === ABSTRACT
With the differences in economic foundation, political systems and processes of marketization, transitional economies differ in their route choices even though their long term goal are identical：steady growth . Transitional economies from plan to markets, is most phenomenal in the end of the 20th century . The discussions on the transitional economies are focused on two typical cases, the Russian shock therapy and China’s gradualist approach . The present text is to analyses the two typical cases of Russia and China, and to make an evaluation the based on the reform of Corporate Governance of SOEs during the transitional period .
The present thesis deals with large State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) reform in mainland China and Russia . First, we study in political and economic background of China and Russia before the large state-owned enterprise reform. Second, we try to find the reasons why the mainland China and Russia choose different transformable model. We try to analyze what’s the difference in the SOEs reform of mainland China and Russia. It compares Russia and mainland China and analyses the characteristics and problems of the two models of transition .
Under a transitional framework, we provide a comprehensive review and analysis on present situations, reform processes, rooted problems and roads to future reforms of mainland China and Russia’s SOEs reforms . To analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the methods of reforming SOEs in China and Russia, this study compares primarily the same and different characteristics of ownership structure and capital construction that China and Russia have formed；meanwhile , the cases of firm are comparison between RAO“UES of Russia”and China Huaneng power company during the reforms corporate governance of State-Owned Enterprises (electric power) in China and Russia.
|
|---|
