| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣科技大學 === 資訊管理系 === 95 === In the beginning of 2006, China proposed autonomous innovation policy, which aimed to transform to innovation-driven economy by 2010 for national development. One development strategy of autonomous innovation is “combining independent technology innovation, patents, and technical standard together to drive Chinese industrial development”. Under such circumstance, in IT industry of China, technical standard industrial alliances are common vehicles to facilitate technology research and development, technology standardization, technical standard promotion, technology commercialization, and the industrial development. The goal of this study is to discuss “Compared to general technical standard alliance, what are the features of the technical standard industrial alliance of IT industry in China?“ and “How the industrial alliance operate to echo relevant polices and become one of policy tools?”
This study shows the features of technical standard industry's alliances in IT industry of China as folllows: they are not only cooperative relationships in enterprise-level but also policy tools for industrial development in industy-level; their origin causes of formation are not only to lower the transaction costs, to share common resources, and to facilitate organizational learning, but also to fight against foreign patent owners’ unreasonable patent royalty collection and to develop Chinese IT industry upon China’s market terrirory. Viewing their operation, they are formed by enterprises, but the public-fund scientific research institution still serves as the secretariat, member join still needs the government’s approval, in addition, the management of the patent pool and the royalty pricing still need the government’s participation. So, the government possesses these alliances and has leading right. In promoting technical standard and developing industry chain, the government has power to let the standard become recommendatory national standard, but in competing with other standards, they still face the market challenge: the end users may not necessarily change or use because of history and interests reasons. We cannot know so far whether or not Chinese technical standards can become “de facto standards” smoothly within the territory of China.
|
|---|
