The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 政治學研究所 === 95 === In political behavior study, it is necessary and practical to infer individual behavior from aggregate data, which is called “ecological inference”, when individual-level data is not available. There is no determinate solution to the ecological inference problem s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2007
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10744966326736952899 |
id |
ndltd-TW-095NTU05227036 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-095NTU052270362015-12-07T04:04:12Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10744966326736952899 The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model 區位推論方法在政治學應用上之限制─區位迴歸、EI模型與BNH模型之比較研究 Tsung-Han Tsai 蔡宗漢 碩士 國立臺灣大學 政治學研究所 95 In political behavior study, it is necessary and practical to infer individual behavior from aggregate data, which is called “ecological inference”, when individual-level data is not available. There is no determinate solution to the ecological inference problem so far, and the purpose of this paper is to clarify the applications of different ecological inference methods by comparing Ecological Regression, EI Model and BBH model which are applied in political science recently. Firstly, this paper makes a definition of the ecological inference problem with which the researchers are concerned in political science. Then it explores how these three models solve the ecological fallacy from statistical setting of models, provided that the ecological inference problem is in terms of a 2×2 cross-table. Finally, it evaluates their performance, among which BBH model is replaced by BNH model, in different data which are set up based on different dimension from survey data. The results show that Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH model are all biased in the situation when the variable in the margin is correlated with the parameter in the cell. In the situation when the standard deviation of parameter decreases, all of the three models are biased as well. The performance of the three models would not be affected with the changes in the mean of parameter. As for the sample size of the aggregate level, it seems not to affect the performance of any model. Overall, Ecological Regression is worse than EI Model and BNH model and the performance of EI Model and BNH model is in a tie. According to the results mentioned above, this paper discusses the limit of ecological inference methods when they are applied to analyze split-ticket voting. 黃旻華 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 99 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺灣大學 === 政治學研究所 === 95 === In political behavior study, it is necessary and practical to infer individual behavior from aggregate data, which is called “ecological inference”, when individual-level data is not available. There is no determinate solution to the ecological inference problem so far, and the purpose of this paper is to clarify the applications of different ecological inference methods by comparing Ecological Regression, EI Model and BBH model which are applied in political science recently. Firstly, this paper makes a definition of the ecological inference problem with which the researchers are concerned in political science. Then it explores how these three models solve the ecological fallacy from statistical setting of models, provided that the ecological inference problem is in terms of a 2×2 cross-table. Finally, it evaluates their performance, among which BBH model is replaced by BNH model, in different data which are set up based on different dimension from survey data.
The results show that Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH model are all biased in the situation when the variable in the margin is correlated with the parameter in the cell. In the situation when the standard deviation of parameter decreases, all of the three models are biased as well. The performance of the three models would not be affected with the changes in the mean of parameter. As for the sample size of the aggregate level, it seems not to affect the performance of any model. Overall, Ecological Regression is worse than EI Model and BNH model and the performance of EI Model and BNH model is in a tie. According to the results mentioned above, this paper discusses the limit of ecological inference methods when they are applied to analyze split-ticket voting.
|
author2 |
黃旻華 |
author_facet |
黃旻華 Tsung-Han Tsai 蔡宗漢 |
author |
Tsung-Han Tsai 蔡宗漢 |
spellingShingle |
Tsung-Han Tsai 蔡宗漢 The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model |
author_sort |
Tsung-Han Tsai |
title |
The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model |
title_short |
The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model |
title_full |
The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model |
title_fullStr |
The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Limit of Application of Ecological Inference Methods in Political Science─A Study on the Comparison of Ecological Regression, EI Model and BNH Model |
title_sort |
limit of application of ecological inference methods in political science─a study on the comparison of ecological regression, ei model and bnh model |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10744966326736952899 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tsunghantsai thelimitofapplicationofecologicalinferencemethodsinpoliticalscienceastudyonthecomparisonofecologicalregressioneimodelandbnhmodel AT càizōnghàn thelimitofapplicationofecologicalinferencemethodsinpoliticalscienceastudyonthecomparisonofecologicalregressioneimodelandbnhmodel AT tsunghantsai qūwèituīlùnfāngfǎzàizhèngzhìxuéyīngyòngshàngzhīxiànzhìqūwèihuíguīeimóxíngyǔbnhmóxíngzhībǐjiàoyánjiū AT càizōnghàn qūwèituīlùnfāngfǎzàizhèngzhìxuéyīngyòngshàngzhīxiànzhìqūwèihuíguīeimóxíngyǔbnhmóxíngzhībǐjiàoyánjiū AT tsunghantsai limitofapplicationofecologicalinferencemethodsinpoliticalscienceastudyonthecomparisonofecologicalregressioneimodelandbnhmodel AT càizōnghàn limitofapplicationofecologicalinferencemethodsinpoliticalscienceastudyonthecomparisonofecologicalregressioneimodelandbnhmodel |
_version_ |
1718146266302513152 |