Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud

博士 === 臺灣大學 === 國家發展研究所 === 95 === By means of the research methods such as legal dogmatics, science of criminal policy and study of comparative law, the dissertation handles questions about the criminal responsibility for “securities fraud”. As far as the structure of it is concerned, in chapters 2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuan-yao Wu, 吳元曜
Other Authors: 陳志龍
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/46709990393157082748
id ndltd-TW-095NTU05011065
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095NTU050110652015-10-13T13:55:54Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/46709990393157082748 Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud 證券詐欺刑事責任之研究 Yuan-yao Wu 吳元曜 博士 臺灣大學 國家發展研究所 95 By means of the research methods such as legal dogmatics, science of criminal policy and study of comparative law, the dissertation handles questions about the criminal responsibility for “securities fraud”. As far as the structure of it is concerned, in chapters 2-4 as the parts of general theories, I lay a foundation for the research from the points of view of protection of legal interests, foreign norms and methods of interpretation. Then, in chapters 5-8 as those of individual discussions, I probe into the criminal elements of “securities fraud”, the relationship of coexistence between it and other crimes, the strategies in criminal procedure and the criticism of lawmaking policies in order, researching into the crime completely in different criminal aspects of application, procedure and lawmaking. I consider that in the aspect of applying the law, by way of the methods of legal interpretation and legal supplements taking account of features of the economic criminal law, especially “the teleological interpretation” and “the teleological reduction” focusing on protection of legal interests, current norms of the criminal responsibility for securities fraud should be applied to concrete cases appropriately; in the aspect of the criminal procedure, in view of characteristics of the economic crimes, we must use the methods of investigation and judgment including the rules of evidence distinct from those for the traditional property crimes to confront the special crime; in the aspect of the criminal lawmaking, the requests for “clarity of the criminal elements”and “elasticity of norms”should be harmonized and balanced, and the commandments of “the principle of responsibility” and “the excess-forbidden principle” must be paid attention to. 陳志龍 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 426 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 臺灣大學 === 國家發展研究所 === 95 === By means of the research methods such as legal dogmatics, science of criminal policy and study of comparative law, the dissertation handles questions about the criminal responsibility for “securities fraud”. As far as the structure of it is concerned, in chapters 2-4 as the parts of general theories, I lay a foundation for the research from the points of view of protection of legal interests, foreign norms and methods of interpretation. Then, in chapters 5-8 as those of individual discussions, I probe into the criminal elements of “securities fraud”, the relationship of coexistence between it and other crimes, the strategies in criminal procedure and the criticism of lawmaking policies in order, researching into the crime completely in different criminal aspects of application, procedure and lawmaking. I consider that in the aspect of applying the law, by way of the methods of legal interpretation and legal supplements taking account of features of the economic criminal law, especially “the teleological interpretation” and “the teleological reduction” focusing on protection of legal interests, current norms of the criminal responsibility for securities fraud should be applied to concrete cases appropriately; in the aspect of the criminal procedure, in view of characteristics of the economic crimes, we must use the methods of investigation and judgment including the rules of evidence distinct from those for the traditional property crimes to confront the special crime; in the aspect of the criminal lawmaking, the requests for “clarity of the criminal elements”and “elasticity of norms”should be harmonized and balanced, and the commandments of “the principle of responsibility” and “the excess-forbidden principle” must be paid attention to.
author2 陳志龍
author_facet 陳志龍
Yuan-yao Wu
吳元曜
author Yuan-yao Wu
吳元曜
spellingShingle Yuan-yao Wu
吳元曜
Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud
author_sort Yuan-yao Wu
title Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud
title_short Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud
title_full Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud
title_fullStr Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud
title_full_unstemmed Research on Criminal Responsibility for Securities Fraud
title_sort research on criminal responsibility for securities fraud
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/46709990393157082748
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanyaowu researchoncriminalresponsibilityforsecuritiesfraud
AT wúyuányào researchoncriminalresponsibilityforsecuritiesfraud
AT yuanyaowu zhèngquànzhàqīxíngshìzérènzhīyánjiū
AT wúyuányào zhèngquànzhàqīxíngshìzérènzhīyánjiū
_version_ 1717745040050094080