| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班 === 95 === In 2000, the party alternation in power occurred in Taiwan, it was the turning point for the 4th nuclear power plant construction plan. From the construction, the construction halt to re-construction for the 4th nuclear power plant, there always has nonstop disputes between the supportive party and anti-nuke action union, and both sides keep on using their resources trying to achieve their goals. Form the angle of viewpoint for Advocacy Coalition Framework, this study thoroughly discusses the strategy utilization of the anti-nuke action union, and what its influential factors are?
The purpose of this study lays in the discussion of the people of Guangliau Township regarding prior and after anti-nuke halt construction strategy realization whether will have a difference because of individual attributions, and through the Advocacy Coalition Framework, to analysis whether the strategy of counter- nucleus group will be under the influence of external environmental factors. Therefore, this study first based on the Advocacy Coalition Framework proposed by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith as a starting angle, collect domestic and international literatures, propose the research structure and hypothesis, and through in-depth interview and questionnaire survey result discovered that the participates in the anti-nuke activity are mostly males, also because of the influence of the 4th nuclear power plant sites, mainly are the fishermen and coastal zone inhabitants. These anti-nuke persons hold the reason to arouse the government’s attention toward environmental topic as well as to prevent the ecological environment from destruction, in order to guarantee the land value of Guangliau Township, but from the perspective of internal environmental construction surface after the halt of 4th nuclear power plant, most inhabitants believe the 4th nuclear power plant construction is our country’s existing policy, they believe anti-nuke does not have significant meaning anymore, it is only a waste of time. In such situation, obviously the counter-nuclear strategy has significant change prior and after the halt construction, currently the expression of anti-nuke mostly present in the school setting or other institutions present by lecture form.
From the above analysis, this study taking the 4th nuclear power plant as an individual case study, on the one hand in hope this forgotten village once again aroused the attention of government and educational field; on the other hand in hope to provide suggestion, in order for the following policy executors, researchers, and the political interest parties to take it as a reference.
Key words: Advocacy Coalition Framework, Internal/External Environmental Factor, Individual Attributions, 4th Nuclear Power Plant
|
|---|
