Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法學系 === 95 === There are eleven statutory reasons for invalidating the arbitral awards under our Arbitration laws. The diversity of statutory reasons is bound to have many lawsuits in invalidating the award of arbitration which might hinder the development of arbitration system and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHEN,SHIH-YUAN, 陳世源
Other Authors: LIN, CHEN-ERH
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/78967810749725724421
id ndltd-TW-095NTPU0194048
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095NTPU01940482015-10-13T14:08:39Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/78967810749725724421 Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award 論撤銷仲裁判斷之法定事由 CHEN,SHIH-YUAN 陳世源 碩士 國立臺北大學 法學系 95 There are eleven statutory reasons for invalidating the arbitral awards under our Arbitration laws. The diversity of statutory reasons is bound to have many lawsuits in invalidating the award of arbitration which might hinder the development of arbitration system and against the arbitration legislative tend in the international arena. If fair, reasonable and legal arbitration awards could be made under an efficient and economical arbitration system, it would not only make the parties involved convinced on the awards , but also encourage the involved parties to use arbitration system to resolve disputes. This is the problem which this paper is going to probe into and find solutions. The research method will first utilize “Induction Method” with referencing to domestic and international arbitration related papers and studies and to find related judgment opinion from domestic legal cases. This study performs induction and analysis; and then uses “Deduction Method” to conduct morals analysis; and finally uses “Comparative Method” to compare the legislative system in other countries and international agreements. The research content includes: Chapter One: Introduction , this chapter explains the research motives, objectives, range and methods; Chapter Two: Arbitration System, this chapter introduces the origin, meaning, advantages , disadvantages, characteristics and types of arbitration system; Chapter Three: Arbitration Agreement, this chapter studies the drafting of arbitration clause, the arbitration clause on bill of lading, the effect of arbitration agreement to third parties and the plea in bar of arbitration agreement; Chapter Four: Arbitration Award, this chapter introduces the meaning, type, formation and effect; Chapter Five: Invalidating arbitral award, this chapter introduces the meaning, method and legal condition of suits; Chapter Six: The statutory reasons for Invalidating arbitral award, this chapter studies and analyzes the eleven reasons for invalidating arbitral award under our Arbitration law.; Chapter Seven: The effect of invalidating arbitral award, it studies when original arbitral award is repealed according to the authority, how does the original dispute resolved, and the perish prescription and interruption; Chapter Eight: Conclusion, this chapter propose suggestions for improving the regulations under our Arbitration Law regarding invalidating arbitral awards from the theoretical and practical aspects of arbitration system. Fair, reasonable and legal arbitral judgment could reduce the number of suits for invalidating arbitral awards raised by the involved parties. In Conclusion, The statutory reasons for invalidating arbitral awards should be simplified and some should be deleted and the solutions for resolving related disputes should be sought. LIN, CHEN-ERH 林誠二 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 167 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法學系 === 95 === There are eleven statutory reasons for invalidating the arbitral awards under our Arbitration laws. The diversity of statutory reasons is bound to have many lawsuits in invalidating the award of arbitration which might hinder the development of arbitration system and against the arbitration legislative tend in the international arena. If fair, reasonable and legal arbitration awards could be made under an efficient and economical arbitration system, it would not only make the parties involved convinced on the awards , but also encourage the involved parties to use arbitration system to resolve disputes. This is the problem which this paper is going to probe into and find solutions. The research method will first utilize “Induction Method” with referencing to domestic and international arbitration related papers and studies and to find related judgment opinion from domestic legal cases. This study performs induction and analysis; and then uses “Deduction Method” to conduct morals analysis; and finally uses “Comparative Method” to compare the legislative system in other countries and international agreements. The research content includes: Chapter One: Introduction , this chapter explains the research motives, objectives, range and methods; Chapter Two: Arbitration System, this chapter introduces the origin, meaning, advantages , disadvantages, characteristics and types of arbitration system; Chapter Three: Arbitration Agreement, this chapter studies the drafting of arbitration clause, the arbitration clause on bill of lading, the effect of arbitration agreement to third parties and the plea in bar of arbitration agreement; Chapter Four: Arbitration Award, this chapter introduces the meaning, type, formation and effect; Chapter Five: Invalidating arbitral award, this chapter introduces the meaning, method and legal condition of suits; Chapter Six: The statutory reasons for Invalidating arbitral award, this chapter studies and analyzes the eleven reasons for invalidating arbitral award under our Arbitration law.; Chapter Seven: The effect of invalidating arbitral award, it studies when original arbitral award is repealed according to the authority, how does the original dispute resolved, and the perish prescription and interruption; Chapter Eight: Conclusion, this chapter propose suggestions for improving the regulations under our Arbitration Law regarding invalidating arbitral awards from the theoretical and practical aspects of arbitration system. Fair, reasonable and legal arbitral judgment could reduce the number of suits for invalidating arbitral awards raised by the involved parties. In Conclusion, The statutory reasons for invalidating arbitral awards should be simplified and some should be deleted and the solutions for resolving related disputes should be sought.
author2 LIN, CHEN-ERH
author_facet LIN, CHEN-ERH
CHEN,SHIH-YUAN
陳世源
author CHEN,SHIH-YUAN
陳世源
spellingShingle CHEN,SHIH-YUAN
陳世源
Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award
author_sort CHEN,SHIH-YUAN
title Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award
title_short Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award
title_full Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award
title_fullStr Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award
title_full_unstemmed Legal Grounds for the Invalidation of Arbitration Award
title_sort legal grounds for the invalidation of arbitration award
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/78967810749725724421
work_keys_str_mv AT chenshihyuan legalgroundsfortheinvalidationofarbitrationaward
AT chénshìyuán legalgroundsfortheinvalidationofarbitrationaward
AT chenshihyuan lùnchèxiāozhòngcáipànduànzhīfǎdìngshìyóu
AT chénshìyuán lùnchèxiāozhòngcáipànduànzhīfǎdìngshìyóu
_version_ 1717749983203033088