| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 運動與休閒管理研究所在職碩士班 === 95 === The purpose of the study was to explore if there exists a significant difference between leisure participation and leisure constraints in personnel of public primary school, junior middle school, high school of Taipei (The duty) School. The research tool was a questionnaire. Using random sampling, 264 individuals (personnel who worked in Taipei 230 public schools in 95 academic years) had been sampled. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, t-test, One-way ANOVA, and Pearson’s correlation coefficients.
The results were founded as the following：
1.Participate in the present situation and participate in frequency on the low side in recreation of the personnel of provided school in Taipei. The top three leisure activities of the sample were: 1.read newspaper, 2.listen to music radio, 3.use computer and surfs the net. In leisure constraints, the most influential was the structural constraint. The top three factors of constraints were: 1.there was another duty 2.the influence from family 3.the places too crowded.
2.There were not significant differences in leisure activities participation with different ages, personnel and the position, professional title, education degree, marital status, school type. There were significant differences in leisure activities participation with different sex, marital status, and staff's number of the service school.
3.There were not significant differences in leisure constraints with different sex, age, personnel and the position, professional title, service seniority of the service school personnel, education degree, marital status, school type, and staff’s number of the service school.
4.The relationship between the leisure participation and constraints was reciprocal effect but not positive.
Based on the results of the study, it would provide some suggestion for personnel competent authority, educational competent authority, administrative unit of the school, consulting and offering recreation to personnel when being participated in and the follow-up researcher's reference while making the policy.
|
|---|
