The Development of Local Cultural Industry in Taiwan and Construction of the Assessment Indicator System

• Main Authors: Yang,Shen-Keng, 楊深耕
• Other Authors: Lin, Jenn-Chuen
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25240457234348832947

博士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 社會教育學系 === 95 === The Development of Local Cultural Industry in Taiwan and Construction of the Assessment Indicator System [Abstract] This research aimed to analyze the development of local cultural industry in Taiwan and construct the community-based assessment indicator system for local cultural industry. The research methods included the documentary analysis, Delphi method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Firstly, the author explored the concept of the cultural industry development, and demonstrated related theoretical foundation of the cultural industry, then overviewed the implementation of local cultural industry, and constructed the original assessment indicators for local cultural industry in Taiwan. Furthermore, based on assessment of quality of the indicators and the degree of their importance by Delphi technique, revision of the indicators framework and content was completed. Establish the assessment indicators of local cultural industry in community empowerment; assess the quality of the indicators and the degree of importance by Delphi technique. Finally, the author used Analytic Hierarchy Process to estimate indicators weights The research result was based on theory to criticize and examine the process of local cultural industry development under the relative policy of the community development. The assessment indicators system constructed was not only to offer the government or the community to quantitatively assesses its local cultural industry in the future, but also to propose every indicator weight to represent different relative importance theoretically. The conclusions and suggestions are as follows: (1).With the social, political, and economic changes, the development of local cultural industry went though three periods, including community development, community empowerment, and local cultural industry development. (2).The development of the local cultural industry was based on shared cultural meaning and interactions among community residents, local geographic, humanistic and historic features, and local industry, artistry and customs. (3).The theoretical foundation for local cultural industry included sociology, postmodernism, cultural economics, and community pedagogy. (4).The spirit and substantial of local cultural industry in Taiwan differed from those proposed by the Frankford School. (5).The assessment indictors of local cultural industry included four major categories: the development plan of cultural industry, characteristics of local cultural industry, administrative assistance and marketing management, and community learn and education. (6). According to the relative weight of the assessment indicator system constructed by this study, 26.85% of the relative weight was on characteristics of cultural industry, 25.994% was on promotion of cultural industry, 25.990% was on administrative assistance and marketing management, and 21.16% was on community learn and education. It was suggested that for applying the assessment indictors and weight system constructed would be adopted to assess and predict the conditions of community cultural industry development.