The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works

博士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 工業教育學系 === 95 === Abstract Today’s creative and aesthetic economy has strongly emphasized the additional economic values generated by the beauty of creative designs. In the interior design industry, creativity and aesthetics are two key components to add additional values and win...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: chuang, Hsiu-Tyan, 莊修田
Other Authors: 吳明雄
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10887819888037050822
id ndltd-TW-095NTNU5037041
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095NTNU50370412016-05-23T04:17:46Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10887819888037050822 The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works 室內設計作品之創意評量,美感判斷與視覺偏好關係研究 chuang, Hsiu-Tyan 莊修田 博士 國立臺灣師範大學 工業教育學系 95 Abstract Today’s creative and aesthetic economy has strongly emphasized the additional economic values generated by the beauty of creative designs. In the interior design industry, creativity and aesthetics are two key components to add additional values and win users preference. The main core of this research is to explore the relationship among variables in creativity evaluation, aesthetic judgment and visual preference about interior design works. The purposes of this research include: (1) Interpretation of psychological attributes and visual qualities of people’s creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment about interior design works. (2) Exploration of different creativity evaluations, aesthetic judgments and visual preferences between subjects of different sexes, graders and departments. (3) Analysis of the relationship among creativity evaluation, aesthetic judgment and visual preference, and the correlations between each two factors of these three variables. (4) Analysis of the explained variance for visual preference. (5) Analysis of the path of creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment affecting visual preference. The applied research methods include the qualitative Delphi and Focus Groups techniques, and the quantitative correlational study. A sampling investigation was conducted using 1041 college students. A self-developed questionnaire with photographs of interior environments was used. The collected data was analyzed with SPSS and LISREL software, applying such techniques as exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, cross-validation, descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson γ, multiple regression, and path analysis. The results include: (1) Each of creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment consists of 7 factors; each factor has unique psychological attributes and visual qualities. (2) The t-test reveals that, out of a total of 28 factors of creativity evaluations, aesthetic judgments and visual preferences, sexes differ significantly in 7 factors, graders differ significantly in 13 factors, and departments differ significantly in 17 factors. (3) The Pearson r analysis shows that correlation coefficients between each two factors of the 18 factors are significant at p<.01 (two-tailed) level. (4) Multiple regression analysis reveals 7 predictive variables accounting for 54.6% of total explained variance. (5) Path analysis of creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment affecting visual preference reveals the rank of path coefficient is: “aesthetic evaluation → visual preference”>“creativity evaluation → aesthetic judgment”>“creativity evaluation → aesthetic judgment → visual preference”. However, “creativity evaluation → visual preference” is not significant. Based on the findings, this study proposes suggestions for teaching and design practices, and future academic research. The result of this pioneer research is expected to be helpful to gain a deeper understanding of creativity and aesthetic related issues, and can be supplemental to empirical studies on the visual qualities of creative works. 吳明雄 林榮泰 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 199 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 博士 === 國立臺灣師範大學 === 工業教育學系 === 95 === Abstract Today’s creative and aesthetic economy has strongly emphasized the additional economic values generated by the beauty of creative designs. In the interior design industry, creativity and aesthetics are two key components to add additional values and win users preference. The main core of this research is to explore the relationship among variables in creativity evaluation, aesthetic judgment and visual preference about interior design works. The purposes of this research include: (1) Interpretation of psychological attributes and visual qualities of people’s creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment about interior design works. (2) Exploration of different creativity evaluations, aesthetic judgments and visual preferences between subjects of different sexes, graders and departments. (3) Analysis of the relationship among creativity evaluation, aesthetic judgment and visual preference, and the correlations between each two factors of these three variables. (4) Analysis of the explained variance for visual preference. (5) Analysis of the path of creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment affecting visual preference. The applied research methods include the qualitative Delphi and Focus Groups techniques, and the quantitative correlational study. A sampling investigation was conducted using 1041 college students. A self-developed questionnaire with photographs of interior environments was used. The collected data was analyzed with SPSS and LISREL software, applying such techniques as exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, cross-validation, descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson γ, multiple regression, and path analysis. The results include: (1) Each of creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment consists of 7 factors; each factor has unique psychological attributes and visual qualities. (2) The t-test reveals that, out of a total of 28 factors of creativity evaluations, aesthetic judgments and visual preferences, sexes differ significantly in 7 factors, graders differ significantly in 13 factors, and departments differ significantly in 17 factors. (3) The Pearson r analysis shows that correlation coefficients between each two factors of the 18 factors are significant at p<.01 (two-tailed) level. (4) Multiple regression analysis reveals 7 predictive variables accounting for 54.6% of total explained variance. (5) Path analysis of creativity evaluation and aesthetic judgment affecting visual preference reveals the rank of path coefficient is: “aesthetic evaluation → visual preference”>“creativity evaluation → aesthetic judgment”>“creativity evaluation → aesthetic judgment → visual preference”. However, “creativity evaluation → visual preference” is not significant. Based on the findings, this study proposes suggestions for teaching and design practices, and future academic research. The result of this pioneer research is expected to be helpful to gain a deeper understanding of creativity and aesthetic related issues, and can be supplemental to empirical studies on the visual qualities of creative works.
author2 吳明雄
author_facet 吳明雄
chuang, Hsiu-Tyan
莊修田
author chuang, Hsiu-Tyan
莊修田
spellingShingle chuang, Hsiu-Tyan
莊修田
The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works
author_sort chuang, Hsiu-Tyan
title The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works
title_short The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works
title_full The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works
title_fullStr The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship among Creativity Evaluation, Aesthetic Judgment and Visual Preference about Interior Design Works
title_sort relationship among creativity evaluation, aesthetic judgment and visual preference about interior design works
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/10887819888037050822
work_keys_str_mv AT chuanghsiutyan therelationshipamongcreativityevaluationaestheticjudgmentandvisualpreferenceaboutinteriordesignworks
AT zhuāngxiūtián therelationshipamongcreativityevaluationaestheticjudgmentandvisualpreferenceaboutinteriordesignworks
AT chuanghsiutyan shìnèishèjìzuòpǐnzhīchuàngyìpíngliàngměigǎnpànduànyǔshìjuépiānhǎoguānxìyánjiū
AT zhuāngxiūtián shìnèishèjìzuòpǐnzhīchuàngyìpíngliàngměigǎnpànduànyǔshìjuépiānhǎoguānxìyánjiū
AT chuanghsiutyan relationshipamongcreativityevaluationaestheticjudgmentandvisualpreferenceaboutinteriordesignworks
AT zhuāngxiūtián relationshipamongcreativityevaluationaestheticjudgmentandvisualpreferenceaboutinteriordesignworks
_version_ 1718277769864937472