| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立交通大學 === 土木工程系所 === 95 === The construction plans of public museums require an evaluation system at the feasibility assessment stage that provides the rationale for the construction. This dissertation examines the feasibility assessment for a public museum construction project by determining if the feasibility assessment analysis is complete, and if the analysis is influential to subsequent construction projects. The evaluation covers a wide range of issues including the formulation of public policies, changes in urban development, evaluation of the impact of construction projects to the environment, and traffic plans. This research, therefore, employs literature review, questionnaires, and in-depth interviews to probe the factors of feasibility assessments for public museum construction projects and locate the crucial factors affecting feasibility, and finally establish an evaluation structure for feasibility assessments and provide a reference for future construction projects.
This research project attempts to establish a reasonable feasibility assessment system and items for evaluation as well as to provide a reference for governments and relevant staff when they make decisions regarding the construction of public museums. The research includes: (1) an exploration of the feasibility assessments for public museum construction projects, and the establishment a feasibility assessment structure; (2) the use of questionnaires to locate crucial items for feasibility assessments; (3) an explanation of the questionnaires results according to in-depth interviews.
According to the thirty five factors for evaluation, the research concludes that the five crucial keys to establishing public museums are namely: 1) the mission and goals for the construction of the museum, 2) accessibility to the land for the construction, 3) preparatory procedures and executive strategies, 4) the relation between the construction project, national policies and higher-level plans, 5) organization and human resources of the preparatory committee.
|
|---|
