2006年世界盃足球賽罰球點球之分析

碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 教練研究所 === 95 === Due to the modification of football match regulation, the penalty kick has become a critical point of the final match-outcome when two national teams have shown the highest equivalent performance and have resolve in a tie. In recent years, this has become a recurri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 張生平
Other Authors: none
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/58710350045993057456
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立體育大學 === 教練研究所 === 95 === Due to the modification of football match regulation, the penalty kick has become a critical point of the final match-outcome when two national teams have shown the highest equivalent performance and have resolve in a tie. In recent years, this has become a recurring phenomenon. This research focused on the penalty kicks in the 2006 World Cup (WC2006). The objective was to identify the possible determining factors influencing the performance of goalkeepers and strikers. Discussion on penalty strategies and other penalty kick researches in the international field were also brought into consideration. Notational analysis and SILOCON COACH, a 2D motion analysis system, were used to analyze data. The results were as below: the places where the ball passed the goalmouth were recorded with a tendency to fall in the two far sides of the goal. This mapping of places has shown great accordance with the result of WC2002. Results also showed the scoring rate, scoring count, and an evident strategy adoption of the GB strategy (early strategy) which conflicts with the results of WC2002, which the GA strategy (late strategy) was adopted more often(WC2002 GA:15, GB:22; WC2006 GA:13, GB:37). Compared to the findings of WC2002, in which GA was better, the results of scoring strategy in WC2006 showed better performance of the GB strategy (WC2002 GA: 41%, GB: 59%; WC2006 GA: 26%, GB: 74%). From the data gathered and analyzed, the GB strategy seemed to be the current trend in terms of adoption and scoring rate. (WC2002 GA: 36%; GB: 11%; WC2006 GA: 8%; GB: 22%). Hence, the GA strategy would likely not be as advantageous as what Kuhn had urged in the 1980s.