Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 地球科學系碩博士班 === 95 === Abstract We used the precise leveling data of Central Geological Survey from 27 leveling lines in Taiwan between 2002 and 2006 to evaluate the data quality and their accuracy and to construct a procedure for checking the observations and analyzing the systemati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Te Chou, 周侑德
Other Authors: Ruey-Juin Rau
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02967426544784076554
id ndltd-TW-095NCKU5135017
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095NCKU51350172015-10-13T13:59:58Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02967426544784076554 Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations 精密水準觀測之資料品質及誤差分析 Yu-Te Chou 周侑德 碩士 國立成功大學 地球科學系碩博士班 95 Abstract We used the precise leveling data of Central Geological Survey from 27 leveling lines in Taiwan between 2002 and 2006 to evaluate the data quality and their accuracy and to construct a procedure for checking the observations and analyzing the systematic errors. The measuring accuracies of about 87% of all single sections are smaller than 1.5 mm √K (K is measures section length, unit for kilometer). Based on our analysis, we found that the error from leveling ruler sinking would accumulate and the correction of this error is between -4.51 and 5.05 mm. In addition, the refraction error and the rod temperature error have significant correction (-1.629-1.519 mm) for systematic errors while estimating the elevation change. The turning point error contributes mainly to the misclosures but not to elevation change. The average misclosure of raw data is 7.3×10-1 mm. After we corrected the raw data according to our procedure, the average misclosure decreases to 1.41×10-3 mm. In the elevation change result, the difference before and after the corrections is 0.72 mm, the maximum value is 4.5mm. The systematic errors can accumulate easily in the mountainous area. If we don’t correct systematic errors, the elevation variation will reach a maximum value of 221.5 mm after 50 years. In regression analyses, the correction parameters refraction error in the plain area is -3.31×10-5 (mm/m3℃) and the correction parameters refraction error in the mountainous area is -4.70×10-5 mm/m3℃. The correction parameters of refraction error in the plain area are different from those in the mountainous area. Ruey-Juin Rau 饒瑞鈞 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 78 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 地球科學系碩博士班 === 95 === Abstract We used the precise leveling data of Central Geological Survey from 27 leveling lines in Taiwan between 2002 and 2006 to evaluate the data quality and their accuracy and to construct a procedure for checking the observations and analyzing the systematic errors. The measuring accuracies of about 87% of all single sections are smaller than 1.5 mm √K (K is measures section length, unit for kilometer). Based on our analysis, we found that the error from leveling ruler sinking would accumulate and the correction of this error is between -4.51 and 5.05 mm. In addition, the refraction error and the rod temperature error have significant correction (-1.629-1.519 mm) for systematic errors while estimating the elevation change. The turning point error contributes mainly to the misclosures but not to elevation change. The average misclosure of raw data is 7.3×10-1 mm. After we corrected the raw data according to our procedure, the average misclosure decreases to 1.41×10-3 mm. In the elevation change result, the difference before and after the corrections is 0.72 mm, the maximum value is 4.5mm. The systematic errors can accumulate easily in the mountainous area. If we don’t correct systematic errors, the elevation variation will reach a maximum value of 221.5 mm after 50 years. In regression analyses, the correction parameters refraction error in the plain area is -3.31×10-5 (mm/m3℃) and the correction parameters refraction error in the mountainous area is -4.70×10-5 mm/m3℃. The correction parameters of refraction error in the plain area are different from those in the mountainous area.
author2 Ruey-Juin Rau
author_facet Ruey-Juin Rau
Yu-Te Chou
周侑德
author Yu-Te Chou
周侑德
spellingShingle Yu-Te Chou
周侑德
Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
author_sort Yu-Te Chou
title Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
title_short Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
title_full Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
title_fullStr Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
title_full_unstemmed Data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
title_sort data quality and error analyses of precise leveling observations
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/02967426544784076554
work_keys_str_mv AT yutechou dataqualityanderroranalysesofpreciselevelingobservations
AT zhōuyòudé dataqualityanderroranalysesofpreciselevelingobservations
AT yutechou jīngmìshuǐzhǔnguāncèzhīzīliàopǐnzhìjíwùchàfēnxī
AT zhōuyòudé jīngmìshuǐzhǔnguāncèzhīzīliàopǐnzhìjíwùchàfēnxī
_version_ 1717747316321943552