Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models

碩士 === 國立高雄應用科技大學 === 金融資訊研究所 === 95 === Value at Risk is a widespread tool of risk management recently. It is a value that measures the worst loss of asset under the particular confidence level and possessed of period. Moreover, it is a quantile describing the tail of distribution of financial retu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anderson, 李坤峰
Other Authors: 李政峰
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2007
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94340679393918205019
id ndltd-TW-095KUAS0213013
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-095KUAS02130132015-10-13T16:41:22Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94340679393918205019 Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models 資料相依性與門檻水準的選擇對極值理論的影響-股票市場風險值的應用資料相依性與門檻水準的選擇對極值理論的影響-股票市場風險值的應用 Anderson 李坤峰 碩士 國立高雄應用科技大學 金融資訊研究所 95 Value at Risk is a widespread tool of risk management recently. It is a value that measures the worst loss of asset under the particular confidence level and possessed of period. Moreover, it is a quantile describing the tail of distribution of financial return series in statistics. In empirical literature, most of financial data have some properties such as fat tails and volatility clustering. Thus, estimating Value at Risk by conventional method may underestimate the quantile as a result of fat tails. We estimate Value at Risk in stock market by using extreme value theory combine with time series models and thereby compared the performance of the conditional Value at Risk with unconditional Value at Risk. In addition, we investigate optimal threshold level among past experience, method argued by hall and method proposed by Danielsson. Then we experiment backtesting on Value at Risk estimator and evaluate efficiency of estimator by LR statistic. We backtest mentioned above on eleven stock indexes:Dow Jones industrial average, Nasdaq, S&P 500, Nikkei 225, Hang Seng index, A-Share, SSE A-Share,FTSE 100,CAC 40, DAX and KOSPI index. Our finding reveals that conditional Value at Risk fitted ARMA(p,q)-GARCH(1,1) performs better than unconditional Value at Risk, and extreme value theory performed better than traditional method. Furthermore, our empirical result displays the performance of conditional Value at Risk which threshold level is decided by Hall1990 and Danielsson1997, indeed improve on model which threshold level is decided by past experience. 李政峰 2007 學位論文 ; thesis 76 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立高雄應用科技大學 === 金融資訊研究所 === 95 === Value at Risk is a widespread tool of risk management recently. It is a value that measures the worst loss of asset under the particular confidence level and possessed of period. Moreover, it is a quantile describing the tail of distribution of financial return series in statistics. In empirical literature, most of financial data have some properties such as fat tails and volatility clustering. Thus, estimating Value at Risk by conventional method may underestimate the quantile as a result of fat tails. We estimate Value at Risk in stock market by using extreme value theory combine with time series models and thereby compared the performance of the conditional Value at Risk with unconditional Value at Risk. In addition, we investigate optimal threshold level among past experience, method argued by hall and method proposed by Danielsson. Then we experiment backtesting on Value at Risk estimator and evaluate efficiency of estimator by LR statistic. We backtest mentioned above on eleven stock indexes:Dow Jones industrial average, Nasdaq, S&P 500, Nikkei 225, Hang Seng index, A-Share, SSE A-Share,FTSE 100,CAC 40, DAX and KOSPI index. Our finding reveals that conditional Value at Risk fitted ARMA(p,q)-GARCH(1,1) performs better than unconditional Value at Risk, and extreme value theory performed better than traditional method. Furthermore, our empirical result displays the performance of conditional Value at Risk which threshold level is decided by Hall1990 and Danielsson1997, indeed improve on model which threshold level is decided by past experience.
author2 李政峰
author_facet 李政峰
Anderson
李坤峰
author Anderson
李坤峰
spellingShingle Anderson
李坤峰
Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models
author_sort Anderson
title Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models
title_short Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models
title_full Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models
title_fullStr Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Extreme Risk in Stock Markets:The Influence of Data Dependence and Choice of Optimal Threshold Level on Extreme Value Models
title_sort modeling extreme risk in stock markets:the influence of data dependence and choice of optimal threshold level on extreme value models
publishDate 2007
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/94340679393918205019
work_keys_str_mv AT anderson modelingextremeriskinstockmarketstheinfluenceofdatadependenceandchoiceofoptimalthresholdlevelonextremevaluemodels
AT lǐkūnfēng modelingextremeriskinstockmarketstheinfluenceofdatadependenceandchoiceofoptimalthresholdlevelonextremevaluemodels
AT anderson zīliàoxiāngyīxìngyǔménkǎnshuǐzhǔndexuǎnzéduìjízhílǐlùndeyǐngxiǎnggǔpiàoshìchǎngfēngxiǎnzhídeyīngyòngzīliàoxiāngyīxìngyǔménkǎnshuǐzhǔndexuǎnzéduìjízhílǐlùndeyǐngxiǎnggǔpiàoshìchǎngfēngxiǎnzhídeyīngyòn
AT lǐkūnfēng zīliàoxiāngyīxìngyǔménkǎnshuǐzhǔndexuǎnzéduìjízhílǐlùndeyǐngxiǎnggǔpiàoshìchǎngfēngxiǎnzhídeyīngyòngzīliàoxiāngyīxìngyǔménkǎnshuǐzhǔndexuǎnzéduìjízhílǐlùndeyǐngxiǎnggǔpiàoshìchǎngfēngxiǎnzhídeyīngyòn
_version_ 1717773715930873856