The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系碩士班 === 94 === We apply Ederington and Guan (2005), to examine the forecasting ability of sixth time-series volatility models, including historical variance, EWMA, GARCH(1,1)-N, GARCH(1,1)-G, and restricted least squares (RLS) and GEN. We seek to determine why one model or grou...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2004
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92523595642238660842 |
id |
ndltd-TW-094TKU05214023 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-094TKU052140232016-06-01T04:14:21Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92523595642238660842 The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods 金融商品波動性預測 Neng-Kai Hsu 許能凱 碩士 淡江大學 財務金融學系碩士班 94 We apply Ederington and Guan (2005), to examine the forecasting ability of sixth time-series volatility models, including historical variance, EWMA, GARCH(1,1)-N, GARCH(1,1)-G, and restricted least squares (RLS) and GEN. We seek to determine why one model or group of models forecasts another focusing on three issues: 1、the proper weighting of older versus recent observations, 2、the relevance of the parameter estimation procedure, and 3、we use four criterions to measure forecast ability. Our evidence indicates 1、The GARCH(1,1)model puts too much weight on the most recent observations and not enough on older observations. 2、Different parameter estimation procedures result in quite different parameter estimates for the same model. 3、The GEN model is the best volatility forecasting model, RLS model is the second, and GARCH(1,1)-G model is always superior to GARCH(1,1)-N model. Ming-Chih Lee 李命志 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 60 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系碩士班 === 94 === We apply Ederington and Guan (2005), to examine the forecasting ability of sixth time-series volatility models, including historical variance, EWMA, GARCH(1,1)-N, GARCH(1,1)-G, and restricted least squares (RLS) and GEN. We seek to determine why one model or group of models forecasts another focusing on three issues: 1、the proper weighting of older versus recent observations, 2、the relevance of the parameter estimation procedure, and 3、we use four criterions to measure forecast ability. Our evidence indicates
1、The GARCH(1,1)model puts too much weight on the most recent observations and not enough on older observations.
2、Different parameter estimation procedures result in quite different parameter estimates for the same model.
3、The GEN model is the best volatility forecasting model, RLS model is the second, and GARCH(1,1)-G model is always superior to GARCH(1,1)-N model.
|
author2 |
Ming-Chih Lee |
author_facet |
Ming-Chih Lee Neng-Kai Hsu 許能凱 |
author |
Neng-Kai Hsu 許能凱 |
spellingShingle |
Neng-Kai Hsu 許能凱 The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods |
author_sort |
Neng-Kai Hsu |
title |
The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods |
title_short |
The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods |
title_full |
The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods |
title_fullStr |
The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods |
title_sort |
forecasting volatility of financial goods |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92523595642238660842 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nengkaihsu theforecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods AT xǔnéngkǎi theforecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods AT nengkaihsu jīnróngshāngpǐnbōdòngxìngyùcè AT xǔnéngkǎi jīnróngshāngpǐnbōdòngxìngyùcè AT nengkaihsu forecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods AT xǔnéngkǎi forecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods |
_version_ |
1718286602599399424 |