The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系碩士班 === 94 === We apply Ederington and Guan (2005), to examine the forecasting ability of sixth time-series volatility models, including historical variance, EWMA, GARCH(1,1)-N, GARCH(1,1)-G, and restricted least squares (RLS) and GEN. We seek to determine why one model or grou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neng-Kai Hsu, 許能凱
Other Authors: Ming-Chih Lee
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92523595642238660842
id ndltd-TW-094TKU05214023
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-094TKU052140232016-06-01T04:14:21Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92523595642238660842 The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods 金融商品波動性預測 Neng-Kai Hsu 許能凱 碩士 淡江大學 財務金融學系碩士班 94 We apply Ederington and Guan (2005), to examine the forecasting ability of sixth time-series volatility models, including historical variance, EWMA, GARCH(1,1)-N, GARCH(1,1)-G, and restricted least squares (RLS) and GEN. We seek to determine why one model or group of models forecasts another focusing on three issues: 1、the proper weighting of older versus recent observations, 2、the relevance of the parameter estimation procedure, and 3、we use four criterions to measure forecast ability. Our evidence indicates 1、The GARCH(1,1)model puts too much weight on the most recent observations and not enough on older observations. 2、Different parameter estimation procedures result in quite different parameter estimates for the same model. 3、The GEN model is the best volatility forecasting model, RLS model is the second, and GARCH(1,1)-G model is always superior to GARCH(1,1)-N model. Ming-Chih Lee 李命志 2004 學位論文 ; thesis 60 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 財務金融學系碩士班 === 94 === We apply Ederington and Guan (2005), to examine the forecasting ability of sixth time-series volatility models, including historical variance, EWMA, GARCH(1,1)-N, GARCH(1,1)-G, and restricted least squares (RLS) and GEN. We seek to determine why one model or group of models forecasts another focusing on three issues: 1、the proper weighting of older versus recent observations, 2、the relevance of the parameter estimation procedure, and 3、we use four criterions to measure forecast ability. Our evidence indicates 1、The GARCH(1,1)model puts too much weight on the most recent observations and not enough on older observations. 2、Different parameter estimation procedures result in quite different parameter estimates for the same model. 3、The GEN model is the best volatility forecasting model, RLS model is the second, and GARCH(1,1)-G model is always superior to GARCH(1,1)-N model.
author2 Ming-Chih Lee
author_facet Ming-Chih Lee
Neng-Kai Hsu
許能凱
author Neng-Kai Hsu
許能凱
spellingShingle Neng-Kai Hsu
許能凱
The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
author_sort Neng-Kai Hsu
title The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
title_short The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
title_full The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
title_fullStr The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
title_full_unstemmed The Forecasting Volatility of Financial Goods
title_sort forecasting volatility of financial goods
publishDate 2004
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/92523595642238660842
work_keys_str_mv AT nengkaihsu theforecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods
AT xǔnéngkǎi theforecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods
AT nengkaihsu jīnróngshāngpǐnbōdòngxìngyùcè
AT xǔnéngkǎi jīnróngshāngpǐnbōdòngxìngyùcè
AT nengkaihsu forecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods
AT xǔnéngkǎi forecastingvolatilityoffinancialgoods
_version_ 1718286602599399424