The Revolt in Albert Camus

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 法國語文學系碩士班 === 94 === Camus wrote down in his Notebooks of 1950, subscribed the next three subjects for his own writing plan: «I. The Myth of Sisyphus (absurd) — II. The Myth of Prometheus (revolt) — III. The Myth of Nemesis » But, Camus didn’t write down the main thought in the third...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mei-Fen YUAN, 袁梅芬
Other Authors: Hsi-Deh WU
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25759108166690058580
id ndltd-TW-094TKU05196001
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-094TKU051960012016-07-22T04:08:47Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25759108166690058580 The Revolt in Albert Camus 卡繆作品中的反抗精神 Mei-Fen YUAN 袁梅芬 碩士 淡江大學 法國語文學系碩士班 94 Camus wrote down in his Notebooks of 1950, subscribed the next three subjects for his own writing plan: «I. The Myth of Sisyphus (absurd) — II. The Myth of Prometheus (revolt) — III. The Myth of Nemesis » But, Camus didn’t write down the main thought in the third stage. We attempt to deliberate the relations between “the absurd”, “the revolt” with Sisyphus and Prometheus. Nemesis in final chapter of the Rebel, represents a kind of the spirit which is called “the moderation”, but this spirit is precisely continues the life manner of “the revolt” stage. This paper attempted to union “the limit” with the image of Nemesis, therefore we saw Camus’ three-stage writing plan turns: « I. The Myth of Sisyphus (absurd) — II. The Myth of Prometheus (revolt) — III. The Myth of Nemesis. (limit) ». In addition, in these discussions of “the absurd” and “the existence”, we realized that from the differences of each stage’s experience; “the revolt” has the different performance pattern, as well as different goals. Therefore, we started to discuss from these two philosophy works (the Myth of Sisypus and the Rebel), and attempted to discover the logic of “the revolt” in each stage. Furthermore, through the character''s image (Sisyphus, Prometheus, and Nemesis) in the ancient Greek mythology story, we deduced from the three kinds of models of “the revolt” (absurd, revolt, and limit), and further discussed the process of “the revolt” in Camus. This thesis divides into four chapters: Chapter one is “the formation of the revolt”, describe the historicity of “the revolt”. Chapter two “the connotation of the revolt”, and chapter three “the model of the revolt”, we discussed what is “the revolt” in Camus from these two philosophy works and three novels (the Stranger, the Plague, and the Fall ). Last but not the least, chapter four, “the spirit of the time in the revolt”, we discussed Camus’ “revolt" and his opinions by the experiences in his life. Hsi-Deh WU 吳錫德 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 151 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 法國語文學系碩士班 === 94 === Camus wrote down in his Notebooks of 1950, subscribed the next three subjects for his own writing plan: «I. The Myth of Sisyphus (absurd) — II. The Myth of Prometheus (revolt) — III. The Myth of Nemesis » But, Camus didn’t write down the main thought in the third stage. We attempt to deliberate the relations between “the absurd”, “the revolt” with Sisyphus and Prometheus. Nemesis in final chapter of the Rebel, represents a kind of the spirit which is called “the moderation”, but this spirit is precisely continues the life manner of “the revolt” stage. This paper attempted to union “the limit” with the image of Nemesis, therefore we saw Camus’ three-stage writing plan turns: « I. The Myth of Sisyphus (absurd) — II. The Myth of Prometheus (revolt) — III. The Myth of Nemesis. (limit) ». In addition, in these discussions of “the absurd” and “the existence”, we realized that from the differences of each stage’s experience; “the revolt” has the different performance pattern, as well as different goals. Therefore, we started to discuss from these two philosophy works (the Myth of Sisypus and the Rebel), and attempted to discover the logic of “the revolt” in each stage. Furthermore, through the character''s image (Sisyphus, Prometheus, and Nemesis) in the ancient Greek mythology story, we deduced from the three kinds of models of “the revolt” (absurd, revolt, and limit), and further discussed the process of “the revolt” in Camus. This thesis divides into four chapters: Chapter one is “the formation of the revolt”, describe the historicity of “the revolt”. Chapter two “the connotation of the revolt”, and chapter three “the model of the revolt”, we discussed what is “the revolt” in Camus from these two philosophy works and three novels (the Stranger, the Plague, and the Fall ). Last but not the least, chapter four, “the spirit of the time in the revolt”, we discussed Camus’ “revolt" and his opinions by the experiences in his life.
author2 Hsi-Deh WU
author_facet Hsi-Deh WU
Mei-Fen YUAN
袁梅芬
author Mei-Fen YUAN
袁梅芬
spellingShingle Mei-Fen YUAN
袁梅芬
The Revolt in Albert Camus
author_sort Mei-Fen YUAN
title The Revolt in Albert Camus
title_short The Revolt in Albert Camus
title_full The Revolt in Albert Camus
title_fullStr The Revolt in Albert Camus
title_full_unstemmed The Revolt in Albert Camus
title_sort revolt in albert camus
publishDate 2006
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/25759108166690058580
work_keys_str_mv AT meifenyuan therevoltinalbertcamus
AT yuánméifēn therevoltinalbertcamus
AT meifenyuan kǎmóuzuòpǐnzhōngdefǎnkàngjīngshén
AT yuánméifēn kǎmóuzuòpǐnzhōngdefǎnkàngjīngshén
AT meifenyuan revoltinalbertcamus
AT yuánméifēn revoltinalbertcamus
_version_ 1718357011778764800