Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision

碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法學系 === 94 === In 1964, the property insurance industry in Taiwan launched the credit bonding insurance, a loyal guarantee service for employers, due to the rising employee dishonest issues. The policy clause and rules of this insurance were revised and renamed as the fidelity bond...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KU,PEI-YU, 古珮玉
Other Authors: CHIANG, CHAO-KUO
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20258996938789364238
id ndltd-TW-094NTPU0194045
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-094NTPU01940452015-10-13T10:38:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20258996938789364238 Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision 員工誠實保證保險理論與實務之分析 KU,PEI-YU 古珮玉 碩士 國立臺北大學 法學系 94 In 1964, the property insurance industry in Taiwan launched the credit bonding insurance, a loyal guarantee service for employers, due to the rising employee dishonest issues. The policy clause and rules of this insurance were revised and renamed as the fidelity bonding insurance in 1986, and then revised again in 2004. This dissertation compares the difference between the insurance articles before and after 2004, in particular on those parts that have caused arguments when insured filed the claim. The conclusions are summarized as below: 1.Loss discovered period, which is under insurer’s coverage, is calculated based on when the loss occurred and when it was noticed. 2.Dishonest behavior should include the behavior of breaching faith. 3.The insurer will not be liable for the loss when it was caused by insured’s infringe on the auditing rules. CHIANG, CHAO-KUO 江朝國 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 79 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法學系 === 94 === In 1964, the property insurance industry in Taiwan launched the credit bonding insurance, a loyal guarantee service for employers, due to the rising employee dishonest issues. The policy clause and rules of this insurance were revised and renamed as the fidelity bonding insurance in 1986, and then revised again in 2004. This dissertation compares the difference between the insurance articles before and after 2004, in particular on those parts that have caused arguments when insured filed the claim. The conclusions are summarized as below: 1.Loss discovered period, which is under insurer’s coverage, is calculated based on when the loss occurred and when it was noticed. 2.Dishonest behavior should include the behavior of breaching faith. 3.The insurer will not be liable for the loss when it was caused by insured’s infringe on the auditing rules.
author2 CHIANG, CHAO-KUO
author_facet CHIANG, CHAO-KUO
KU,PEI-YU
古珮玉
author KU,PEI-YU
古珮玉
spellingShingle KU,PEI-YU
古珮玉
Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
author_sort KU,PEI-YU
title Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
title_short Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
title_full Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
title_fullStr Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
title_full_unstemmed Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
title_sort fidelity bonding insurance --analyzing insurance policy and judicial decision
publishDate 2006
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20258996938789364238
work_keys_str_mv AT kupeiyu fidelitybondinginsuranceanalyzinginsurancepolicyandjudicialdecision
AT gǔpèiyù fidelitybondinginsuranceanalyzinginsurancepolicyandjudicialdecision
AT kupeiyu yuángōngchéngshíbǎozhèngbǎoxiǎnlǐlùnyǔshíwùzhīfēnxī
AT gǔpèiyù yuángōngchéngshíbǎozhèngbǎoxiǎnlǐlùnyǔshíwùzhīfēnxī
_version_ 1716831656341405696