Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法學系 === 94 === In 1964, the property insurance industry in Taiwan launched the credit bonding insurance, a loyal guarantee service for employers, due to the rising employee dishonest issues. The policy clause and rules of this insurance were revised and renamed as the fidelity bond...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2006
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20258996938789364238 |
id |
ndltd-TW-094NTPU0194045 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-094NTPU01940452015-10-13T10:38:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20258996938789364238 Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision 員工誠實保證保險理論與實務之分析 KU,PEI-YU 古珮玉 碩士 國立臺北大學 法學系 94 In 1964, the property insurance industry in Taiwan launched the credit bonding insurance, a loyal guarantee service for employers, due to the rising employee dishonest issues. The policy clause and rules of this insurance were revised and renamed as the fidelity bonding insurance in 1986, and then revised again in 2004. This dissertation compares the difference between the insurance articles before and after 2004, in particular on those parts that have caused arguments when insured filed the claim. The conclusions are summarized as below: 1.Loss discovered period, which is under insurer’s coverage, is calculated based on when the loss occurred and when it was noticed. 2.Dishonest behavior should include the behavior of breaching faith. 3.The insurer will not be liable for the loss when it was caused by insured’s infringe on the auditing rules. CHIANG, CHAO-KUO 江朝國 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 79 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立臺北大學 === 法學系 === 94 === In 1964, the property insurance industry in Taiwan launched the credit bonding insurance, a loyal guarantee service for employers, due to the rising employee dishonest issues. The policy clause and rules of this insurance were revised and renamed as the fidelity bonding insurance in 1986, and then revised again in 2004.
This dissertation compares the difference between the insurance articles before and after 2004, in particular on those parts that have caused arguments when insured filed the claim. The conclusions are summarized as below:
1.Loss discovered period, which is under insurer’s coverage, is calculated based on when the loss occurred and when it was noticed.
2.Dishonest behavior should include the behavior of breaching faith.
3.The insurer will not be liable for the loss when it was caused by insured’s infringe on the auditing rules.
|
author2 |
CHIANG, CHAO-KUO |
author_facet |
CHIANG, CHAO-KUO KU,PEI-YU 古珮玉 |
author |
KU,PEI-YU 古珮玉 |
spellingShingle |
KU,PEI-YU 古珮玉 Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision |
author_sort |
KU,PEI-YU |
title |
Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision |
title_short |
Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision |
title_full |
Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision |
title_fullStr |
Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fidelity Bonding Insurance --Analyzing Insurance Policy and Judicial Decision |
title_sort |
fidelity bonding insurance --analyzing insurance policy and judicial decision |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/20258996938789364238 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kupeiyu fidelitybondinginsuranceanalyzinginsurancepolicyandjudicialdecision AT gǔpèiyù fidelitybondinginsuranceanalyzinginsurancepolicyandjudicialdecision AT kupeiyu yuángōngchéngshíbǎozhèngbǎoxiǎnlǐlùnyǔshíwùzhīfēnxī AT gǔpèiyù yuángōngchéngshíbǎozhèngbǎoxiǎnlǐlùnyǔshíwùzhīfēnxī |
_version_ |
1716831656341405696 |