The Relationship Between Lived Experiences and Thinking Styles for College Students in Taiwan

碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 教育研究所 === 94 === The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between lived experiences and thinking styles for college students in Taiwan.Investigation method is employed in the study.There are 2443 college students are served as the standardization sample in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chia-ling Wu, 吳佳玲
Other Authors: none
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/80784753735092408375
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立中山大學 === 教育研究所 === 94 === The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between lived experiences and thinking styles for college students in Taiwan.Investigation method is employed in the study.There are 2443 college students are served as the standardization sample in order to develop their percentile norm in Taiwan.In addition,there are 346 college students to write Thinking Style Inventory with Lived Experience Inventory of the norm sample. The data is analyzed through descriptive statistics,t-test,One-Way ANOVA and canonical correlation. The results indicate that: 1.College students’lived experiences styles tend to be group activities style, and then thinking styles tend to be monarchic style.There are no significant differences in the mean scores of all kinds of lived experiences and thinking styles. 2.Gender has significant differents in the college students’lived experiences and thinking styles.Birth order has no significant differents in the college students’lived experiences and thinking styles.Then education level of parents has significant differents in the college students’lived experiences,but in the thinking styles is not. 3.The shool background have no significant differents in the college students’lived experiences and thinking styles. 4.College students’lived experiences have canonical correlation with college students’thinking styles.The first canonical factor of college students’lived experiences efficacy explains 4% of all the college students’thinking styles.