| Summary: | 碩士 === 南華大學 === 社會學研究所 === 94 === The fighting between piracy and copy right has been consisting for more then decades. Hence, the conception of what is right to wrong also in this discussion. In the past, the research always put the moral ethic, states-economy culture, and legal- risk to make explanation for piracy. Even the same idea provide for government and record manufacturers to put the piracy into criminal behavior. But be honestly, we can’t even find a one respond for-why people want to buy privacy product? Is it can''t afford the price? Either way doesn’t want to do? Or simple answer-coz they can''t find a good copy right product instead of buying the piracy. All we know is government set a more highly standard to punish people who make copy or even buy that, they also decline it is the way to discipline this issue.
Nowadays Anti-piracy is the main issue for society of Taiwan. The authority of anti-piracy is also surpassing for either can’t afford the price or can''t find a good product. Otherwise if we ignoring it, how can we penetrate the authority behind customer, monopoly ideology, culture sphere to crystallize the piracy behavior. So that the main point of this research is to describe the anti-piracy action in Taiwan. How does it be active in our society within argument to support this movement? Finally what’s the result of this action? Furthermore, we have to retrospective the whole arguments of the general or reasonable existing. To find out is it truly solves the piracy problems or just put the wrong to right idea to punish the non-rational customer.
We criticize the production and consumption to re prosecute the relationship between piracy and copy right. However it is or not piracy it is product, also respond the structure of production. Not only wrong to right can fix this problem. In fact, the user of piracy or not separate two different hierarchies but sometimes combined together depends on user''s identity, distinguish, taste, education problems. Honestly, there''s no way to ban on piracy, the only way we can do is supply the foundation and motivation of copy right to reduce the user from piracy. Although it will become Conspicuous and Symbol Consumption or remarkable the distinguish within class, the way sociologist un pleasant with. But don''t forget the consumption society that Baudrillard argued has been our social life now, and no state law can immune the existing habit of human-being.
|
|---|
