A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:

碩士 === 國立新竹教育大學 === 人資處體育教學碩士班 === 94 === This case study aimed to explore the teacher and student behavior resulted from adapted physical education applied by elementary school physical education teacher and special education teacher in a hearing impaired class. The instruction data was collected f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: 陳小玲
Other Authors: 張春秀
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30961435652367943602
id ndltd-TW-094NHCT5567011
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-094NHCT55670112015-10-13T16:31:18Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30961435652367943602 A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers: 體育與特教教師適應體育教學師生行為之個案研究 陳小玲 碩士 國立新竹教育大學 人資處體育教學碩士班 94 This case study aimed to explore the teacher and student behavior resulted from adapted physical education applied by elementary school physical education teacher and special education teacher in a hearing impaired class. The instruction data was collected from badminton class and volleyball class; two class periods for each. The teacher and student behavior was analyzed by PETAI. Moreover, to further examine variables affected the teacher and student behavior, interviews with the teachers and students were conducted. By applying PETAI, the paper analyzed the time when teacher behavior and student behavior category occurred. The results are: I. Allocated time for teacher behavior:The allocated time for physical education teacher’s instruction, both of the teachers spent most of the time on response presentation and the least amount of time on motivational feedback. The physical education teacher’s behavior management was spent most of the time on organzation, least amount of time was spent on other tasks. As to special education teacher, most of the time was spent on behavior management and the least amount of time was spent on other tasks. II. Allocated time for student behavior:Students’ participated behavior under education teacher’s instruction, while allocated skill learning time made up most of the time of students’ participated behavior; warm-up & review made up the least of the time. Students’ behavior management time under physical education teacher’s instruction was spent most of the time on organization and least amount of time on other tasks. When under special education teacher’s instruction, students’ behavior management time was spent most of the time on behavior management and the least of time on other tasks. III. Difference between Teacher and Student Behavior. 張春秀 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 93 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 國立新竹教育大學 === 人資處體育教學碩士班 === 94 === This case study aimed to explore the teacher and student behavior resulted from adapted physical education applied by elementary school physical education teacher and special education teacher in a hearing impaired class. The instruction data was collected from badminton class and volleyball class; two class periods for each. The teacher and student behavior was analyzed by PETAI. Moreover, to further examine variables affected the teacher and student behavior, interviews with the teachers and students were conducted. By applying PETAI, the paper analyzed the time when teacher behavior and student behavior category occurred. The results are: I. Allocated time for teacher behavior:The allocated time for physical education teacher’s instruction, both of the teachers spent most of the time on response presentation and the least amount of time on motivational feedback. The physical education teacher’s behavior management was spent most of the time on organzation, least amount of time was spent on other tasks. As to special education teacher, most of the time was spent on behavior management and the least amount of time was spent on other tasks. II. Allocated time for student behavior:Students’ participated behavior under education teacher’s instruction, while allocated skill learning time made up most of the time of students’ participated behavior; warm-up & review made up the least of the time. Students’ behavior management time under physical education teacher’s instruction was spent most of the time on organization and least amount of time on other tasks. When under special education teacher’s instruction, students’ behavior management time was spent most of the time on behavior management and the least of time on other tasks. III. Difference between Teacher and Student Behavior.
author2 張春秀
author_facet 張春秀
陳小玲
author 陳小玲
spellingShingle 陳小玲
A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:
author_sort 陳小玲
title A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:
title_short A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:
title_full A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:
title_fullStr A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:
title_full_unstemmed A case Study of Adapted Physical Education and Special Program Teachers:
title_sort case study of adapted physical education and special program teachers:
publishDate 2006
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30961435652367943602
work_keys_str_mv AT chénxiǎolíng acasestudyofadaptedphysicaleducationandspecialprogramteachers
AT chénxiǎolíng tǐyùyǔtèjiàojiàoshīshìyīngtǐyùjiàoxuéshīshēngxíngwèizhīgèànyánjiū
AT chénxiǎolíng casestudyofadaptedphysicaleducationandspecialprogramteachers
_version_ 1717771742049468416