| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立彰化師範大學 === 復健諮商研究所 === 94 === The purpose of this survey research were to understand the present situation of leisure activities, to investigate the scores on subjective and objective quality of leisure life scales, as well as the discrepancy between the scores.
This research conducted the investigation method of the questionnaire to collect data through the Object and Subject Quality of Leisure Life Scales developed by the researcher. There were 212 respondents sampled from 10 organizations for people with hearing-impairment in Taiwan. The statistics used in this study to analyze the data comprised of frequency, percentage, Chi-square, contingency correlation, Cramer’s V correlation, and logistic regression.
The main findings are summarized as four sections.
1.The descriptive results of leisure activities were as followed:
(1)The most frequent participating leisure activities that subjects participate in were (a) recreation, (b) exercise, and (c) gardening or fishing.
(2)The most important sources of leisure information are from the organizations. The most important leisure opportunities that subjects participated in were activities held by organizations.
(3)There are 58.9% of the subjects believed the leisure were needed, 33.96% of subjects believed the leisure were not essential, and 7.14% of subjects conceived the leisure were unnecessary.
(4)The most significant recreational obstacles are the leisure time and their disabilities.
(5)The percentage that subjects participated in leisure activities with people without hearing-impairment amount to 70%, and they were satisfied with the current situation.
2.The significant difference between the scores of Quality of Leisure Life Scales and the related variables were listed as followed:
(1)The variables that had statistically significant differences on the scores of the Objective Quality of Leisure Life Scales were age being observed, levels of disabilities, school types, educational degree, spouse with or without hearing-impairment, having a family, levels of salary, communication ways, residential area, leisure categories, sources of leisure information, participating leisure activities spontaneously, leisure value, recreational obstacles, inclusion conformability, and inclusion satisfaction.
(2)The variables that has statistically significant differences on the scores of the Subjective Quality of Leisure Life Scales were age being observed, levels of disabilities, school types, educational degree, spouse with or without hearing-impairment, having a family, levels of salary, communication ways, residential area, leisure categories, sources of leisure information, participating leisure activities spontaneously, leisure value, recreational obstacles, inclusion conformability, and inclusion satisfaction.
3.The significant relations between the scores of Quality of Leisure Life Scales and the variables were listed as followed:
(1)Significant relations existed between the scores of Objective Quality of Leisure Life and the variables, such as the age, levels of disabilities, school types, educational degree, spouse with or without hearing-impairment, having a family, levels of salary, communication ways, residential area, leisure categories, sources of leisure information, participating leisure activities spontaneously, leisure value, recreational obstacles, inclusion conformability, and inclusion satisfaction.
(2)Significant relations existed between the scores of Subjective Quality of Leisure Life and the variables, such as the age, levels of disabilities, school types, educational degree, spouse with or without hearing-impairment, having a family, levels of salary, communication ways, residential area, leisure categories, sources of leisure information, participating leisure activities spontaneously, leisure value, recreational obstacles, inclusion conformability, and inclusion satisfaction.
4.The predictors of the scores of quality of leisure life scales were listed as followed:
(1)The predictors of the scores of Objective Quality of Leisure Life Scales were levels of disabilities, educational degrees, and school types.
(2)The predictors of the scores of Subjective Quality of Leisure Life Scales were levels of disabilities, educational degrees, school types, marital status, spouse with or without hearing-impairment, having a family, and residential area.
(3)The predictors of the discrepancy between the scores of the Subjective and Objective Quality of Leisure Life are gender, educational degrees, marital status, spouse with or without hearing-impairment, having a family, sources of leisure information, leisure opportunities, and recreational obstacles.
According to the research outcomes, suggestions were proposed by the investigator respectively on government’s policies, non-profit organizations, and adult education programs.
|
|---|
