A Study on the Learning Effect of Different Instructional Strategies in Pitching Grenade of National Defense Physical Education

碩士 === 國立體育學院 === 體育研究所 === 94 === The purpose was to investigate the research of traditional instruction method and cooperative learning method in pitching grenade. This study provided applications and references of instructional method for our school. The participants were 70 three grade students...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kou-Lng Lou, 羅光龍
Other Authors: none
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/79461446397435524983
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立體育學院 === 體育研究所 === 94 === The purpose was to investigate the research of traditional instruction method and cooperative learning method in pitching grenade. This study provided applications and references of instructional method for our school. The participants were 70 three grade students from two class in senior in Army Academy school. The research method was Quasi-Experimental Study. Used quantity method to know the learning effect of two groups and assisted with observation of student’s learning attitude. The inventory included pitching cognition assessment, pitching skill assessment and affection inventory. Used paired and independent sample t-test to compare the learning effects and learning responses of two groups. The results were as followed: 1.cognition aspect: pretest and posttest revealed two groups were advanced. The posttest of experimental group was better than that of control group. 2.skill aspect: the posttests of two instructional methods were better than pretests. There was none significant difference between two groups. This might have a relation with learning environment and training time. 3.affection aspect: the posttest was better than pretest in control group, but there was none significant differences. In experimental group, there were significant differences between different students. The affection assessment of experimental group was better than that of control group.