The Comparison Between “National Pension Law” and“Labor Retirement Pension System” in the Legislative Process ---- from the Polity-Centered Perspective

碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 政治經濟學研究所 === 94 === The “Labor Retirement Pension System” which safeguards laborer’s old-age retirement was passed in 2004 and launched on July 1st, 2005. However, the “National Pension Law” safeguards everyone’s old-age financial security, actually to 2004 year's end, the fif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shu-Yu Yeh, 葉書毓
Other Authors: Wen-Hui Tang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/30029341166513638057
Description
Summary:碩士 === 國立成功大學 === 政治經濟學研究所 === 94 === The “Labor Retirement Pension System” which safeguards laborer’s old-age retirement was passed in 2004 and launched on July 1st, 2005. However, the “National Pension Law” safeguards everyone’s old-age financial security, actually to 2004 year's end, the fifth session of Legislative Yuan is unable to pass, and returns the Executive Yuan repeat to plan. This research examines two legislation policies, processes and the compares results,and survey during 1993 to 2005 session of Legislative Yuan proceeding,discusses the state inspection agency, the social group and the political party via polity-centered influences on two policy impetus processes. This research discovered that (1) for the Labor Retirement Pension System impetus, the state predominate at a low level, but since national pension law policies strongly influence government finance, the state agency obviously lead the entire policy impetus; (2) the Labor Retirement Pension System was legislated mainly by the Council of Labor Affairs, but the national pension law was lead by the Council of Economic Planning and Development; (3) for the Labor Retirement Pension System impetus, labor groups exert huge pressure on the government, but impels the national pension law legislation the social group actually to be unable like the labor group equally to give the pressure. (4) The Labor Retirement Pension System was passed due to business compromise, but the national pension law appears to be the result of political party competition. However, (5)during later period of the national pension law, political parties have not appeared to hold different positions, and political party competition has weakened.