高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 學校行政碩士在職專班 === 94 === The purpose of the study is to explore the relationships between Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. The study aims at four dimensions. The first one is to explore the reality for Community Senior High School and Senior High School Effective...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2006
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/18688300256198066786 |
id |
ndltd-TW-094NCCU5626008 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 學校行政碩士在職專班 === 94 === The purpose of the study is to explore the relationships between Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. The study aims at four dimensions. The first one is to explore the reality for Community Senior High School and Senior High School Effectiveness. Secondly, the researcher also investigated the differences of school staff and householder’s demographic variables and school’s background variables among Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. Thirdly, the study analyzes the relationships among Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. Finally, the study explores the predicative power of Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness.
This study employed questionnaires as the method of study. The subjects were 646 educational staff randomly sampled from Senior High Schools and householders in HsinChu and Miaoli area. Data were analyzed using the method of descriptive and inferential statistics, including Frequencies, t-test, ANOVA, Correlation analysis and Multiple stepwise regression analysis. The major findings are as follows:
1. There is no significant difference in overall cognition of Community Senior High School among teachers and parents of different genders. There is also no significant difference among all dimensions.
2. Teachers and parents aged above 51 have better conception of Community Senior High School than other age groups.
3. Teachers who have served for more than 26 years have better understanding of Community Senior High School than those of less than 26 years of service.
4. President and Representative of parent committee have better cognition of Community Senior High School than other school-position groups.
5. There is no significant difference in overall viewpoint of Community Senior High School and Vocational School among teachers and parents at different kinds of schools.
6. Teachers and parents of private high schools have better understanding of Community Senior High School than those of public schools.
7. The location of schools makes no significant difference in the conception of Community Senior High School among teachers and parents.
8. Teachers and parents of the schools having less than 24 classes and more than 51 classes have a better picture of Community Senior High School than those of the schools with 24 to 50 classes.
9. Male teachers and parent have better sense of School Effectiveness than female ones.
10. Teachers and parents aged above 41 have better conception of School Effectiveness than those under 40.
11. Teachers who have served for more than 26 years have better understanding of School Effectiveness than those less than 26 years.
12. The school principal has better cognition of School Effectiveness than the ones of different positions in school.
13. Teachers and parents of senior high schools have better conception of School Effectiveness than those of vocational high schools and of comprehensive high schools.
14. Teachers and parents of private high schools have better understanding of School Effectiveness than those of public schools.
15. The location of schools makes no significant difference in teachers’ and parents’ conception of School Effectiveness.
16. Teachers and parents of the schools with more than 51 classes have a better picture of School Effectiveness than those of the schools with less than 50 classes.
17. The better the attitudes of teachers and parents towards the dimensions of Community Senior High School, the higher the School Effectiveness.
18. The two dimensions, “Resource Sharing” and “Participation and Support,” of Community Senior High School have predicative efficacy for each dimensions of School Effectiveness.
19. The two dimensions, “Resource Sharing” and “Participation and Support,” of Community Senior High School have predicative efficacy for School Effectiveness
Based on the result of this study, some suggestions are made for educational administration, the Senior High School and Vocational School staffs and future study.
|
author2 |
林邦傑 |
author_facet |
林邦傑 吳聲坤 |
author |
吳聲坤 |
spellingShingle |
吳聲坤 高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
author_sort |
吳聲坤 |
title |
高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
title_short |
高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
title_full |
高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
title_fullStr |
高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
title_full_unstemmed |
高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
title_sort |
高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/18688300256198066786 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wúshēngkūn gāozhōngzhíshèqūhuàyǔxuéxiàoxiàonéngzhīxiāngguānyánjiūyǐzhúmiáoqūwèilì |
_version_ |
1718287898042695680 |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-094NCCU56260082016-06-01T04:15:06Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/18688300256198066786 高中職社區化與學校效能之相關研究-以竹苗區為例 吳聲坤 碩士 國立政治大學 學校行政碩士在職專班 94 The purpose of the study is to explore the relationships between Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. The study aims at four dimensions. The first one is to explore the reality for Community Senior High School and Senior High School Effectiveness. Secondly, the researcher also investigated the differences of school staff and householder’s demographic variables and school’s background variables among Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. Thirdly, the study analyzes the relationships among Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. Finally, the study explores the predicative power of Community Senior High School and School Effectiveness. This study employed questionnaires as the method of study. The subjects were 646 educational staff randomly sampled from Senior High Schools and householders in HsinChu and Miaoli area. Data were analyzed using the method of descriptive and inferential statistics, including Frequencies, t-test, ANOVA, Correlation analysis and Multiple stepwise regression analysis. The major findings are as follows: 1. There is no significant difference in overall cognition of Community Senior High School among teachers and parents of different genders. There is also no significant difference among all dimensions. 2. Teachers and parents aged above 51 have better conception of Community Senior High School than other age groups. 3. Teachers who have served for more than 26 years have better understanding of Community Senior High School than those of less than 26 years of service. 4. President and Representative of parent committee have better cognition of Community Senior High School than other school-position groups. 5. There is no significant difference in overall viewpoint of Community Senior High School and Vocational School among teachers and parents at different kinds of schools. 6. Teachers and parents of private high schools have better understanding of Community Senior High School than those of public schools. 7. The location of schools makes no significant difference in the conception of Community Senior High School among teachers and parents. 8. Teachers and parents of the schools having less than 24 classes and more than 51 classes have a better picture of Community Senior High School than those of the schools with 24 to 50 classes. 9. Male teachers and parent have better sense of School Effectiveness than female ones. 10. Teachers and parents aged above 41 have better conception of School Effectiveness than those under 40. 11. Teachers who have served for more than 26 years have better understanding of School Effectiveness than those less than 26 years. 12. The school principal has better cognition of School Effectiveness than the ones of different positions in school. 13. Teachers and parents of senior high schools have better conception of School Effectiveness than those of vocational high schools and of comprehensive high schools. 14. Teachers and parents of private high schools have better understanding of School Effectiveness than those of public schools. 15. The location of schools makes no significant difference in teachers’ and parents’ conception of School Effectiveness. 16. Teachers and parents of the schools with more than 51 classes have a better picture of School Effectiveness than those of the schools with less than 50 classes. 17. The better the attitudes of teachers and parents towards the dimensions of Community Senior High School, the higher the School Effectiveness. 18. The two dimensions, “Resource Sharing” and “Participation and Support,” of Community Senior High School have predicative efficacy for each dimensions of School Effectiveness. 19. The two dimensions, “Resource Sharing” and “Participation and Support,” of Community Senior High School have predicative efficacy for School Effectiveness Based on the result of this study, some suggestions are made for educational administration, the Senior High School and Vocational School staffs and future study. 林邦傑 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 155 zh-TW |