歷史教育與時代聚焦的轉變：以2000年高中歷史教科書下冊為例的討論

• Main Author: 郭智勇
• Other Authors: 呂芳上
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2006
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/33938001138479793956

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 歷史研究所 === 94 === After the school year of 1999, history textbooks for senior high school were no longer published, in a unified version, by the Ministry of Education (MOE) only; private publishing houses have been allowed to compile and publish various versions of textbooks since then. Even though all publishers follow the curriculum standards/ guidelines enacted by the MOE in 1995, diversity of contents still exists because of different concerns about compilation. Currently, there are six versions of history textbooks for senior high school: San-min, Da-tong, Zheng-zhong, Nan-yi, Jian-hong, and Long-teng, and therefore it is necessary to have a further discussion. This paper discusses the evolution of history education and history textbooks for senior high school and the relationship between the two by analyzing the interplay between politics and history. Since the six versions of history textbooks are very different in their external structure and contents because of varied concerns over compilation, and the diversity is especially apparent in their political stances, modern and contemporary history of Chinese are chosen as the topics to be compared and analyzed. As for methodology, this paper mainly takes the content analysis approach due to the characteristics of textbooks. It compares the differences in titles, outlines, footnotes, and chronologies of important events by making quantitative analysis of the external structure, and compares the disparities in texts, historical evaluation, pictures, and questions for discussion by analyzing the contents. By doing so, the paper aims at examining whether the textbooks meet the curriculum standards, observing how the teaching materials have changed, and discussing the impacts brought by the change on college entrance exams and history education. Also, it is hoped that the paper offers reflections on historical research and history education in Taiwan from different perspectives, and the suggestions will be considered and adopted by the educational authorities.