| Summary: | 碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 勞工研究所 === 94 === The standards about legalization of dispatched employment had been enacted in the foreign countries. Legislation of dispatched employment had been enacted in Japan in 1985; besides Germany and America also made special laws and regulations about dispatched employment. All about the forbidden regulations also had been abolished in Denmark. From those examples of developed countries above, we can understand that the legalization about dispatched employment is forced by the world trend. The difference between dispatched employment and typical employment is that the dispatched employees are employed by the dispatched work agency but they provide service to the user enterprise. Because the triangular arrangement of dispatched employment concerns the interaction among user enterprise, dispatched work agency and dispatched workers, so there are many disputations between employees and employers.
Although the Department of Commerce of MOEA in Taiwan permitted the enterprise to register their operations as “Employee dispatching industry” in October 1999, there were still no relevant laws about dispatched employment. The International Labor Organization had made the conventions and recommendations about dispatched employment; moreover Germany and Japan also made the relevant laws. In order to protect the rights of dispatched labors, the law-making which correspond with our national conditions is of great urgency. By comparing of the legalization about dispatched employment of America, Germany and Japan, we want to know the practical conditions and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of those countries above. By doing so, we can provide our country with the referential aspects in making the law about the dispatched employment in the future. Finally, in order to establish the legalization about dispatched employment corresponded with our society and to create a win-win situation of employee and employer, we analyze the existent Dispatched Employment Bill in Taiwan and bring forward certain relative lawmaking proposals.
|
|---|
