台灣地區大學排名指標建構之研究

• Main Author: 湯家偉
• Other Authors: 吳政達
• Format: Others
• Language: zh-TW
• Published: 2006
• Online Access: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/73098728595608961696

碩士 === 國立政治大學 === 教育研究所 === 94 === The purpose of this study is to construct the Taiwan university ranking indicators which aim to evaluate the education quality of universities. As for research methods, by means of literature review, 68 indicators within 9 main dimensions had been organized as a raw model of Taiwan university ranking indicators based on which the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire was developed and the survey was conducted with the sample size of 20 higher education experts. Symmetric triangular fuzzy number then was used to analyze experts’ opinion on the importance of each indicator and to help indicator selection. At last stage, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each dimensions and indicators; accordingly, the Taiwan university ranking indicator system was constructed. The main conclusions are as follows： 1.The Taiwan university ranking indicator system consists with 9 dimensions and 29 indicators in total. The 9 dimensions are: faculty quality(12.7%), curriculum and teaching(12.5%), research(11.7%),reputation(11.6%), student selectivity(11.5%), performance of students and graduates (11.5%), financial resources(10.0%), internationalization(9.7%), inclusiveness(8.8%). 2.The dimension of faculty quality consists with： percent of full-time faculty with top terminal degree(4.4%), percent of full-time faculty as professor(4.2%), percent of full-time faculty(4.1%) 3.The dimension of curriculum and teaching consists with：staff:student ratio (6.5%), student evaluation of course(6.0%) 4.The dimension of research consists with：research grants per academic staff member(1.5%), percent of academic staff member with National Faculty Awards(1.5%), percent of academic staff member with Academy membership (1.5%), publications on Nature, Science, SCI, SSCI, TSSCI, EI and A&HCI per academic staff member (1.4%), citations per article on Nature, Science, SCI, SSCI, TSSCI, EI and A&HCI (1.5%), articles in peer-reviewed journals per academic staff member (1.4%), articles in international conferences per academic staff member (1.5%), publications of book per academic staff member(1.4%) 5.The dimension of student selectivity consists with：Acceptance Rate(4.9%), Entry score(6.6%) 6.The dimension of reputation consists with：peer assessment(4.0%), employer assessment(3.8%), graduate assessment(3.9%) 7.The dimension of performance of students and graduates consists with：the success of the student body at winning national academic awards within 5 years(3.7%), graduate employment(4.1%), correspondent (3.7%) 8.The dimension of financial resources consists with：revenue per student(4.8%), library spent per student 9.The dimension of internationalization consists with：percent of international students (excludes those who major in Chinese) (3.2%), percent of international academic staff member (3.0%), international cooperation projects(3.5%) 10.The dimension of internationalization consists with：attract students from underrepresented groups(2.8%), working hours at school per student (2.7%), expense as subvene for the poor students(3.3%) According to the conclusions, some suggestions had been proposed： 1.suggestions for higher education administrators 2.suggestions for those who are going to conduct university rankings 3.suggestions for university ranking information users 4.suggestions for further study.