A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law
碩士 === 逢甲大學 === 經營管理碩士在職專班 === 94 === According to the rule 19 of Constitute, property right is citizens’ basic right. However, property right is also a conditional and limited one. On the one hand, the government is legitimated to take people’s property from tax imposition. On the other hand, peopl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2005
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/54085566881163499357 |
id |
ndltd-TW-094FCU05457022 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-094FCU054570222015-10-13T10:34:09Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/54085566881163499357 A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law 稅法實質課稅原則一般規範立法之研究 Kuen-Yang Lin 林坤陽 碩士 逢甲大學 經營管理碩士在職專班 94 According to the rule 19 of Constitute, property right is citizens’ basic right. However, property right is also a conditional and limited one. On the one hand, the government is legitimated to take people’s property from tax imposition. On the other hand, people are allowed to adopt legislative methods to avoid the heavier taxation by executing their legal right of property-scheming. Since the legislation of laws represents the spirit of justice and equity, tax laws should also follow the principle of tax-equity. Consequently, the purpose of substance-over-form principle is to help realize tax-equity. Substance-over-form principle is usually used to explain the appropriateness of Tax Law in order to prevent tax-avoidance. However, there haven’t been concrete and literal regulations about the general norms of substance-over-form principle. As a result, it is easily interpreted arbitrarily by revenue service offices to infringe people’s property right. Bearing this consideration, the study aims to focus on how to make legislation in light of substance-over-form principle for both citizens and revenue service offices to act upon. First, the study introduces the foreign legislations related to substance-over-form principle. The reviewed legislation examples include the general principles of taxation in Germany, Income Tax Law, Corporation Tax Law, Succession Law in Japan, and Internal Revenue Code of USA. The study further compares the relevant cases and the court’s judgments as our legislation references. As for the domestic legal practices about substance-over-form principle, the study illustrates the explanations from the grand justice council and individual tax laws. From these legal provisions, several lation types are differentiated. Finally, the study attempted to reconstruct legislation types regarding substance-over-form principle, and map out the detailed legislative contents based on substance-over-form principle. none 陳貴端 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 151 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 逢甲大學 === 經營管理碩士在職專班 === 94 === According to the rule 19 of Constitute, property right is citizens’ basic right. However, property right is also a conditional and limited one. On the one hand, the government is legitimated to take people’s property from tax
imposition. On the other hand, people are allowed to adopt legislative methods to avoid the heavier taxation by executing their legal right of
property-scheming. Since the legislation of laws represents the spirit of justice and equity, tax laws should also follow the principle of tax-equity. Consequently, the purpose of substance-over-form principle is to help realize tax-equity.
Substance-over-form principle is usually used to explain the appropriateness of Tax Law in order to prevent tax-avoidance. However, there haven’t been concrete and literal regulations about the general norms of substance-over-form principle. As a result, it is easily interpreted arbitrarily by revenue service offices to infringe people’s property right.
Bearing this consideration, the study aims to focus on how to make legislation in light of substance-over-form principle for both citizens and
revenue service offices to act upon.
First, the study introduces the foreign legislations related to substance-over-form principle. The reviewed legislation examples include the general principles of taxation in Germany, Income Tax Law, Corporation Tax Law, Succession Law in Japan, and Internal Revenue
Code of USA. The study further compares the relevant cases and the court’s judgments as our legislation references.
As for the domestic legal practices about substance-over-form principle, the study illustrates the explanations from the grand justice council and individual tax laws. From these legal provisions, several lation types are differentiated. Finally, the study attempted to reconstruct legislation types regarding substance-over-form principle, and
map out the detailed legislative contents based on substance-over-form principle.
|
author2 |
none |
author_facet |
none Kuen-Yang Lin 林坤陽 |
author |
Kuen-Yang Lin 林坤陽 |
spellingShingle |
Kuen-Yang Lin 林坤陽 A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law |
author_sort |
Kuen-Yang Lin |
title |
A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law |
title_short |
A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law |
title_full |
A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law |
title_fullStr |
A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Study of Substance-over-Form Principle in Tax Law |
title_sort |
study of substance-over-form principle in tax law |
publishDate |
2005 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/54085566881163499357 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kuenyanglin astudyofsubstanceoverformprincipleintaxlaw AT línkūnyáng astudyofsubstanceoverformprincipleintaxlaw AT kuenyanglin shuìfǎshízhìkèshuìyuánzéyībānguīfànlìfǎzhīyánjiū AT línkūnyáng shuìfǎshízhìkèshuìyuánzéyībānguīfànlìfǎzhīyánjiū AT kuenyanglin studyofsubstanceoverformprincipleintaxlaw AT línkūnyáng studyofsubstanceoverformprincipleintaxlaw |
_version_ |
1716830179088662528 |