The Study of Military Arsenal’s Crisis Management

碩士 === 大葉大學 === 人力資源暨公共關係學系碩士在職專班 === 94 === In the past, when dealing with the crisis, a military manufacturing factory usually follows the a straigforward logistic. “Preparation for the crisis, Occurrence of the crisis, Management of the crisis, Termination of the crisis.” However, due to the dyna...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chern,Der-Ming, 陳德明
Other Authors: Kao,Lie-Jane
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/90006798035721641175
Description
Summary:碩士 === 大葉大學 === 人力資源暨公共關係學系碩士在職專班 === 94 === In the past, when dealing with the crisis, a military manufacturing factory usually follows the a straigforward logistic. “Preparation for the crisis, Occurrence of the crisis, Management of the crisis, Termination of the crisis.” However, due to the dynamics of the environment, people now have more diversified and multidispline ways of thinking when dealing with the crisis. This study adopts the “Pattern of the Crisis Development Status” in Nunamaker, F. Jr., Weber, E. S. and Chen, Minder’s article, which divided the pattern into three phases: 1. Before the crisis occurs; 2. During the crisis proceeds, and 3. After the crisis is resolved. In this study, the incident of the explosion of an abolished bomb in 203 Military Manufacturing Factory is considered. In-depth interviews are conducted one by one to those who helped to manage the crisis in the incident in order to gain a profound understanding about the crisis management mechanism of military manufacturing factories. The goal is to investigate whether there are any solid plans to prevent such incidents before the explosion, whether the mechanism of crisis management changes in accordance with the variation of the environment so that the strategies introduced could resolve the crisis more effectively, and whether the experience of the past crisis management has been learned and imprinted as a useful knowledge for future references. According to this study, it discloses the fact that the crisis management in a military manufacturing factory is only focused on the control of the damages caused by crises. More works on the collection of information and generalization of the knowledge related to the crisis learned form previous experiences are still in demand. We may apply the “Pattern of the Crisis Development Status”up by Nunamaker Jr. et. al. with the revised to the mode of management in military manufacturing factories so that the Pattern would fit the factories better. We look forward to the military manufacturing factories coming up with well-prepared mechanisms and nipping future crises in the bud.