Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow

碩士 === 中華大學 === 機械與航太工程研究所 === 94 === In this research, turbulence models were divided into three categories. The first category uses wall distance in their damping function, such as κ-ε turbulence models of Chien and Nagano & Kim. The second category couples the wall distance with turbulence ki...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ping-Huang Chen, 陳炳煌
Other Authors: Yi-Lung Yang
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2006
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47767242693830815505
id ndltd-TW-094CHPI0598036
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-094CHPI05980362016-06-01T04:14:45Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47767242693830815505 Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow 不同紊流模式於迴流區域之分析與比較 Ping-Huang Chen 陳炳煌 碩士 中華大學 機械與航太工程研究所 94 In this research, turbulence models were divided into three categories. The first category uses wall distance in their damping function, such as κ-ε turbulence models of Chien and Nagano & Kim. The second category couples the wall distance with turbulence kinetic energy in their damping function, such as κ-ε turbulence models of Fan, and Yang & Shih. The last category is a wall-distance-free turbulence model. They are Wilcox’s κ-ω turbulence model, Jones & Launder κ-ε turbulence model、Launder & Sharma κ-ε turbulence model and Goldberg & Apsley κ-ε turbulence model. A fully developed turbulence pipe flow was used to examine the performance of these turbulence models. The results showed the κ-ε turbulence models of Chien and Fan, and κ-ω turbulence model of low Reynolds number perform better in terms of velocity distribution, turbulence kinetic energy distribution, and dissipative rate distribution. Two reversed flow problems were used to validate these turbulence models. The first case is the channel flow over a two-dimensional hump. The second problem is the flow over a slanted backward-facing step. In both cases, the Chien’s κ-ε turbulence model gives the best velocity distribution and eddy viscosity distribution among these three models. The κ-ε turbulence model of fan gives almost the same result of Chien’s. The low Reynolds number κ-ω turbulence model provides a much smaller eddy viscosity and lack of mixing in the region of reverse flows. The difference between the current turbulence calculation and experiment is still large. Further modification of the turbulence models is still required. Yi-Lung Yang 楊一龍 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 82 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 中華大學 === 機械與航太工程研究所 === 94 === In this research, turbulence models were divided into three categories. The first category uses wall distance in their damping function, such as κ-ε turbulence models of Chien and Nagano & Kim. The second category couples the wall distance with turbulence kinetic energy in their damping function, such as κ-ε turbulence models of Fan, and Yang & Shih. The last category is a wall-distance-free turbulence model. They are Wilcox’s κ-ω turbulence model, Jones & Launder κ-ε turbulence model、Launder & Sharma κ-ε turbulence model and Goldberg & Apsley κ-ε turbulence model. A fully developed turbulence pipe flow was used to examine the performance of these turbulence models. The results showed the κ-ε turbulence models of Chien and Fan, and κ-ω turbulence model of low Reynolds number perform better in terms of velocity distribution, turbulence kinetic energy distribution, and dissipative rate distribution. Two reversed flow problems were used to validate these turbulence models. The first case is the channel flow over a two-dimensional hump. The second problem is the flow over a slanted backward-facing step. In both cases, the Chien’s κ-ε turbulence model gives the best velocity distribution and eddy viscosity distribution among these three models. The κ-ε turbulence model of fan gives almost the same result of Chien’s. The low Reynolds number κ-ω turbulence model provides a much smaller eddy viscosity and lack of mixing in the region of reverse flows. The difference between the current turbulence calculation and experiment is still large. Further modification of the turbulence models is still required.
author2 Yi-Lung Yang
author_facet Yi-Lung Yang
Ping-Huang Chen
陳炳煌
author Ping-Huang Chen
陳炳煌
spellingShingle Ping-Huang Chen
陳炳煌
Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow
author_sort Ping-Huang Chen
title Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow
title_short Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow
title_full Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow
title_fullStr Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Various Low-Reynolds Number Turbulence Models in Recirculation Flow
title_sort assessment of various low-reynolds number turbulence models in recirculation flow
publishDate 2006
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/47767242693830815505
work_keys_str_mv AT pinghuangchen assessmentofvariouslowreynoldsnumberturbulencemodelsinrecirculationflow
AT chénbǐnghuáng assessmentofvariouslowreynoldsnumberturbulencemodelsinrecirculationflow
AT pinghuangchen bùtóngwěnliúmóshìyúhuíliúqūyùzhīfēnxīyǔbǐjiào
AT chénbǐnghuáng bùtóngwěnliúmóshìyúhuíliúqūyùzhīfēnxīyǔbǐjiào
_version_ 1718287008509460480