The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 中國文學所 === 94 === This thesis is divided into six chapters。In the first Chapter of introduction, the author analyzes the debates and research works on the theory of Yuandao proposed by Liu-Xie in his masterpiece--- Wenxin Diaolong. In addition, the research methods and framework of...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Others |
Language: | zh-TW |
Published: |
2006
|
Online Access: | http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65566094806860587578 |
id |
ndltd-TW-094CCU05045008 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-TW-094CCU050450082015-10-13T10:45:05Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65566094806860587578 The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie 劉勰原道觀的詮釋與反思 Chun-tsan Hsien 謝君讚 碩士 國立中正大學 中國文學所 94 This thesis is divided into six chapters。In the first Chapter of introduction, the author analyzes the debates and research works on the theory of Yuandao proposed by Liu-Xie in his masterpiece--- Wenxin Diaolong. In addition, the research methods and framework of this thesis would also be explained. In the second and the third Chapters which are entitled “Restatement and Reflection to the Contemporary Hermeneutic System”, in which the author gives reflection and examination on the theories about Yuandao of current scholars in accordance with the view of consistency and harmonization of hermeneutic system. Furthermore, some defects in these abovementioned scholars’ hermeneutic theories will be discussed, and their values will also be adopted. The forth Chapter is entitled “the annotation to the Yuandao Section of Wenxin Diaolong”. In this Chapter the author will put the theory adopted and abstracted from the above Chapters into practice of the annotation to the content of Yuandao Section. The fifth Chapter is entitled “Reflection on some issues in the Mie-Huo-Lun”. In this Chapter, the author tries to clarify some issues in Liu-Xie’s Mie-Huo-Lun, such as the accomplished date of “Mie-Huo-Lun”, which approaches adopted in the Qi-Dynasty Theory or Liang-Dynasty Theory is evidently correct? If the accomplishment of “Mie-Huo-Lun” can prove Liu-Xie has became a devoted Buddhist? Are there diversities between Liu-Xie’s earlier works and later works? How should the holiness and Dao in “Mie-Huo-Lun” be annotated? And what is the difference between the “Dao” mentioned in Yuandao and the “Dao” mentioned in “Mie-Huo-Lun”? The sixth Chapter, the author will draw a conclusion to this research and point out potential directions for future research. Hsi-San Lai 賴錫三 2006 學位論文 ; thesis 221 zh-TW |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
zh-TW |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
碩士 === 國立中正大學 === 中國文學所 === 94 === This thesis is divided into six chapters。In the first Chapter of introduction, the author analyzes the debates and research works on the theory of Yuandao proposed by Liu-Xie in his masterpiece--- Wenxin Diaolong. In addition, the research methods and framework of this thesis would also be explained.
In the second and the third Chapters which are entitled “Restatement and Reflection to the Contemporary Hermeneutic System”, in which the author gives reflection and examination on the theories about Yuandao of current scholars in accordance with the view of consistency and harmonization of hermeneutic system. Furthermore, some defects in these abovementioned scholars’ hermeneutic theories will be discussed, and their values will also be adopted.
The forth Chapter is entitled “the annotation to the Yuandao Section of Wenxin Diaolong”. In this Chapter the author will put the theory adopted and abstracted from the above Chapters into practice of the annotation to the content of Yuandao Section.
The fifth Chapter is entitled “Reflection on some issues in the Mie-Huo-Lun”. In this Chapter, the author tries to clarify some issues in Liu-Xie’s Mie-Huo-Lun, such as the accomplished date of “Mie-Huo-Lun”, which approaches adopted in the Qi-Dynasty Theory or Liang-Dynasty Theory is evidently correct? If the accomplishment of “Mie-Huo-Lun” can prove Liu-Xie has became a devoted Buddhist? Are there diversities between Liu-Xie’s earlier works and later works? How should the holiness and Dao in “Mie-Huo-Lun” be annotated? And what is the difference between the “Dao” mentioned in Yuandao and the “Dao” mentioned in “Mie-Huo-Lun”?
The sixth Chapter, the author will draw a conclusion to this research and point out potential directions for future research.
|
author2 |
Hsi-San Lai |
author_facet |
Hsi-San Lai Chun-tsan Hsien 謝君讚 |
author |
Chun-tsan Hsien 謝君讚 |
spellingShingle |
Chun-tsan Hsien 謝君讚 The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie |
author_sort |
Chun-tsan Hsien |
title |
The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie |
title_short |
The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie |
title_full |
The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie |
title_fullStr |
The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Annotation and Reflection to the Yuandao Section of Liu-Xie |
title_sort |
annotation and reflection to the yuandao section of liu-xie |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/65566094806860587578 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chuntsanhsien theannotationandreflectiontotheyuandaosectionofliuxie AT xièjūnzàn theannotationandreflectiontotheyuandaosectionofliuxie AT chuntsanhsien liúxiéyuándàoguāndequánshìyǔfǎnsī AT xièjūnzàn liúxiéyuándàoguāndequánshìyǔfǎnsī AT chuntsanhsien annotationandreflectiontotheyuandaosectionofliuxie AT xièjūnzàn annotationandreflectiontotheyuandaosectionofliuxie |
_version_ |
1716832627658326016 |