The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors

碩士 === 淡江大學 === 教育心理與諮商研究所碩士班 === 93 === The purpose of this study is to explore how the metacognitive skills influences the process of counselors’ case conceptualization, and further analyze the conditions and differences between experienced counselors and novice counselors in a counseling process....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei,Yu-wen, 魏瑜雯
Other Authors: Chih-en Ko
Format: Others
Language:zh-TW
Published: 2005
Online Access:http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00065316337865825760
id ndltd-TW-093TKU05329004
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-TW-093TKU053290042015-10-13T18:44:56Z http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00065316337865825760 The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors 後設認知技能涉入諮商員個案概念化過程研究--以專家與新手諮商員為例 Wei,Yu-wen 魏瑜雯 碩士 淡江大學 教育心理與諮商研究所碩士班 93 The purpose of this study is to explore how the metacognitive skills influences the process of counselors’ case conceptualization, and further analyze the conditions and differences between experienced counselors and novice counselors in a counseling process. By interviewing two experts and two novice counselors, we can better understand how metacognitive skills influence case conceptualization process. Furthermore, we can summarize its sequence of ideas as well as its principles to provide future counselors better reference-frameworks in order to promote counseling quality. This study uses the in-depth interviews and semi-structured guideline to interview the counselors; using the checking list of case conceptualization, interview summary, and classification system of metacognition as research tools; analyze and sum up by open-code method. The results are as below: 1. Knowledge schema influences difference in self-connection. 2. In subject-connection, expert counselors’ self-connecting are more quickly, exquisitely, correctly and diversely than novice counselors’. 3. Both experts and novice counselors are able to aware how different situations and personalities influence counseling, however, the focus is different. 4. In the self-selecting system, experts are better than novice counselors because novice counselors are easily affected by the supervisions. 5. Expert counselors provide better self-monitoring. In contrast, novice counselors are sometimes tense and easily disturbed by trivial information. 6. Expert counselors can achieve processing goals by self-planning according to the available information. In contrast, novice counselors can’t. 7. Expert counselors are able to revise the assumptions, targets and strategies of counseling cases according to different situations. In contrast, novice counselors do it less. 8. Expert counselors never consciously aware that they are using the metacognitive skills. However, novice counselors can aware, when they are using it .because they have learned it. 9. Novice counselors feel that they are supervised after interviews while experts do not. Finally, based on the results of this research, the researcher offers some recommendations as reference materials for both counseling practice and future studies. Chih-en Ko, 柯志恩 2005 學位論文 ; thesis 147 zh-TW
collection NDLTD
language zh-TW
format Others
sources NDLTD
description 碩士 === 淡江大學 === 教育心理與諮商研究所碩士班 === 93 === The purpose of this study is to explore how the metacognitive skills influences the process of counselors’ case conceptualization, and further analyze the conditions and differences between experienced counselors and novice counselors in a counseling process. By interviewing two experts and two novice counselors, we can better understand how metacognitive skills influence case conceptualization process. Furthermore, we can summarize its sequence of ideas as well as its principles to provide future counselors better reference-frameworks in order to promote counseling quality. This study uses the in-depth interviews and semi-structured guideline to interview the counselors; using the checking list of case conceptualization, interview summary, and classification system of metacognition as research tools; analyze and sum up by open-code method. The results are as below: 1. Knowledge schema influences difference in self-connection. 2. In subject-connection, expert counselors’ self-connecting are more quickly, exquisitely, correctly and diversely than novice counselors’. 3. Both experts and novice counselors are able to aware how different situations and personalities influence counseling, however, the focus is different. 4. In the self-selecting system, experts are better than novice counselors because novice counselors are easily affected by the supervisions. 5. Expert counselors provide better self-monitoring. In contrast, novice counselors are sometimes tense and easily disturbed by trivial information. 6. Expert counselors can achieve processing goals by self-planning according to the available information. In contrast, novice counselors can’t. 7. Expert counselors are able to revise the assumptions, targets and strategies of counseling cases according to different situations. In contrast, novice counselors do it less. 8. Expert counselors never consciously aware that they are using the metacognitive skills. However, novice counselors can aware, when they are using it .because they have learned it. 9. Novice counselors feel that they are supervised after interviews while experts do not. Finally, based on the results of this research, the researcher offers some recommendations as reference materials for both counseling practice and future studies.
author2 Chih-en Ko,
author_facet Chih-en Ko,
Wei,Yu-wen
魏瑜雯
author Wei,Yu-wen
魏瑜雯
spellingShingle Wei,Yu-wen
魏瑜雯
The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors
author_sort Wei,Yu-wen
title The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors
title_short The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors
title_full The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors
title_fullStr The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors
title_full_unstemmed The analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–The comparison between the expert and novice counselors
title_sort analysis of metacognition involved in counseling process–the comparison between the expert and novice counselors
publishDate 2005
url http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/00065316337865825760
work_keys_str_mv AT weiyuwen theanalysisofmetacognitioninvolvedincounselingprocessthecomparisonbetweentheexpertandnovicecounselors
AT wèiyúwén theanalysisofmetacognitioninvolvedincounselingprocessthecomparisonbetweentheexpertandnovicecounselors
AT weiyuwen hòushèrènzhījìnéngshèrùzīshāngyuángèàngàiniànhuàguòchéngyánjiūyǐzhuānjiāyǔxīnshǒuzīshāngyuánwèilì
AT wèiyúwén hòushèrènzhījìnéngshèrùzīshāngyuángèàngàiniànhuàguòchéngyánjiūyǐzhuānjiāyǔxīnshǒuzīshāngyuánwèilì
AT weiyuwen analysisofmetacognitioninvolvedincounselingprocessthecomparisonbetweentheexpertandnovicecounselors
AT wèiyúwén analysisofmetacognitioninvolvedincounselingprocessthecomparisonbetweentheexpertandnovicecounselors
_version_ 1718036641083293696